Montgomery Guy H, Sucala Madalina, Dillon Matthew J, Schnur Julie B
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.
Psychol Conscious (Wash D C). 2018 Jun;5(2):212-220. doi: 10.1037/cns0000141.
Despite the available empirical evidence supporting the efficacy of hypnosis for alleviating symptoms and side effects across a variety of clinical contexts, hypnosis has failed to disseminate widely. One way to try to better understand the lack of hypnosis dissemination is to apply a marketing theory approach, focusing on attitudes and beliefs about a product (hypnosis) held by consumers. Better understanding of such factors can lead to strategies to promote the product among consumers, and in this case, encourage dissemination. The goal of the study was to investigate relationships between interest in hypnosis use and: 1) attitudes about hypnosis; 2) beliefs about the effectiveness of hypnosis (i.e., hypnosis credibility, and hypnosis effectiveness expectancies); 3) past experience with hypnosis; and 4) the perceived hedonic value and utility of hypnosis. The study also explored participants' preferences for hypnosis delivery method (i.e., live or recorded), as well as preferences for hypnosis labeling (i.e., how hypnosis is defined). Participants (N = 509) were recruited through Amazon Mechanical Turk and completed an anonymous online survey. The results revealed that participants' attitudes about hypnosis, their expectancies for the effectiveness of hypnosis, and the perceived hedonic value of hypnosis accounted for unique variance in participants' interest in hypnosis, ps < .05. Together, these variables accounted for 73% of the variance in participants' interest in hypnosis use. Based on these findings, we recommend that these key variables should be considered when planning for greater dissemination and uptake of empirically supported hypnosis interventions.
尽管有实证证据支持催眠在各种临床情境中缓解症状和副作用的功效,但催眠并未得到广泛传播。试图更好地理解催眠传播不足的一种方法是应用营销理论方法,重点关注消费者对产品(催眠)的态度和信念。更好地理解这些因素可以制定在消费者中推广该产品的策略,在这种情况下,就是鼓励传播。该研究的目的是调查对催眠使用的兴趣与以下方面之间的关系:1)对催眠的态度;2)对催眠效果的信念(即催眠可信度和催眠效果预期);3)过去的催眠经历;4)催眠的感知享乐价值和效用。该研究还探讨了参与者对催眠实施方式(即现场或录音)的偏好,以及对催眠标签(即催眠如何定义)的偏好。参与者(N = 509)通过亚马逊土耳其机器人平台招募,并完成了一项匿名在线调查。结果显示,参与者对催眠的态度、对催眠效果的预期以及催眠的感知享乐价值在参与者对催眠的兴趣中占独特的方差,p <.05。这些变量共同解释了参与者对催眠使用兴趣中方差的73%。基于这些发现,我们建议在规划更广泛传播和采用经实证支持的催眠干预措施时应考虑这些关键变量。