Répássy Gábor, Küstel Marianna, Szőnyi Magdolna, Enreiter Ádám, Birtalan Ede, Tamás László
Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Semmelweis University, 36 Szigony St., Budapest 1083, Hungary.
Ear Nose Throat J. 2018 Jul;97(7):E4-E7. doi: 10.1177/014556131809700702.
When cochlear implantation was first introduced, the mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy approach was the most frequently used technique to gain access to the middle ear and the cochlea. Since 2000, several authors have routinely used a non-mastoidectomy nonposterior tympanotomy technique, which has undergone several modifications. Alternative surgical techniques for cochlear implantation have recently been introduced, such as endomeatal-alone or suprameatal-alone and combined posterior tympanotomy/endomeatal approaches. The goal of this study was to describe another modification of this less invasive technique to perform cochlear implantation. Cochlear implantations were performed between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2012, in 220 patients through the posterior suprameatal approach. In reviewing our experiences, we have concluded that this approach, which eliminates the need for mastoidectomy, is considered safe, time-efficient, and minimally invasive. The possible pitfalls and the microsurgical relevance of anatomic structures of this technique are discussed in detail. Using this technique, not all classical anatomic orientation points are identified. However, certain landmarks predict the depth and the three-dimensional location of invisible anatomic structures.
当首次引入人工耳蜗植入术时,乳突切除术和后鼓室切开术是最常用于进入中耳和耳蜗的技术。自2000年以来,几位作者常规使用一种非乳突切除非后鼓室切开技术,该技术已经历了几次改进。最近引入了人工耳蜗植入的替代手术技术,如单纯耳道内或单纯耳道上以及联合后鼓室切开术/耳道内入路。本研究的目的是描述这种微创技术的另一种改进方法以进行人工耳蜗植入。2002年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间,通过耳道上后方入路对220例患者进行了人工耳蜗植入。回顾我们的经验,我们得出结论,这种无需乳突切除术的入路被认为是安全、高效且微创的。详细讨论了该技术可能存在的陷阱以及解剖结构的显微外科相关性。使用这种技术,并非所有经典的解剖定位点都能被识别。然而,某些标志可预测不可见解剖结构的深度和三维位置。