文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

已接受治疗的非小细胞肺癌的许可治疗方法的比较疗效和安全性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy and safety of licensed treatments for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Division of Health Sciences, Coventry, England.

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Jul 25;13(7):e0199575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199575. eCollection 2018.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0199575
PMID:30044785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6059384/
Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review with network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of currently licensed second-line treatments in patients with late stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with advanced/metastatic NSCLC receiving second/third line treatments were screened. We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE; EMBASE; Web of Science) from January, 2000 to July, 2017. Two reviewers screened bibliographic records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias of included studies. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and drug-related grade 3-5 adverse-events (AEs). We pooled study-specific hazard ratios (HR; for OS and PFS) and risk ratios (RR; for AEs) using conventional and network-meta-analyses, and ranked interventions by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. FINDINGS: We included 11 RCTs (7,581 participants) comparing nine drugs. All drugs except for erlotinib significantly improved OS compared to docetaxel. Nivolumab was the highest ranking drug followed by atezolizumab and pembrolizumab. There was no significant difference in OS across these three drugs (HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.79, 1.21 for nivolumab vs atezolizumab; HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.77, 1.25 for nivolumab vs pembrolizumab). For PFS, ramucirumab + docetaxel and nivolumab were the drugs with the highest ranking. All interventions except ramucirumab + docetaxel had a reduced risk for severe drug-related AEs vs. docetaxel. Of the drugs with the highest ranking on AEs, nivolumab was significantly safer compared to atezolizumab (RR = 0.55, 95% CI 0.38, 0.79) or pembrolizumab (RR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.34, 0.81). IMPLICATIONS: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab exhibited superior benefit/risk balance compared to other licensed drugs used late stage NSCLC. Our results indicate that the use of immunotherapies in people diagnosed with non-specific late stage NSCLC should be promoted. The use of docetaxel may now be judged irrelevant as a comparator intervention for approval of new drugs for second line treatment of NSCLC. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42017065928.

摘要

目的:本系统评价通过网络荟萃分析比较了晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者二线治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法:筛选了接受二线/三线治疗的晚期/转移性 NSCLC 患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们检索了电子数据库(MEDLINE;EMBASE;Web of Science)从 2000 年 1 月到 2017 年 7 月。两位审查员筛选文献记录、提取数据,并评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。主要结局为总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和药物相关 3-5 级不良事件(AE)。我们使用常规和网络荟萃分析对研究特定的风险比(HR;用于 OS 和 PFS)和风险比(RR;用于 AE)进行了汇总,并通过累积排序曲线下的面积对干预措施进行了排名。

结果:我们纳入了 11 项 RCT(7581 名参与者),比较了 9 种药物。除厄洛替尼外,所有药物均显著提高了 OS 与多西他赛相比。纳武单抗是排名最高的药物,其次是阿特珠单抗和派姆单抗。这三种药物的 OS 无显著差异(HR=0.98,95%CI0.79,1.21 纳武单抗与阿特珠单抗相比;HR=0.98,95%CI0.77,1.25 纳武单抗与派姆单抗相比)。对于 PFS,雷莫芦单抗+多西他赛和纳武单抗是排名最高的药物。与多西他赛相比,所有干预措施均降低了严重药物相关 AE 的风险,除了雷莫芦单抗+多西他赛。在 AE 方面排名最高的药物中,与阿特珠单抗(RR=0.55,95%CI0.38,0.79)或派姆单抗(RR=0.52,95%CI0.34,0.81)相比,纳武单抗的安全性显著更高。

结论:纳武单抗、派姆单抗和阿特珠单抗与其他晚期 NSCLC 二线治疗中使用的已上市药物相比具有更好的获益/风险平衡。我们的结果表明,应该推广免疫疗法在诊断为非特异性晚期 NSCLC 人群中的应用。现在可能认为多西他赛作为新批准的二线治疗 NSCLC 药物的比较干预措施已不相关。

研究注册号:PROSPERO CRD42017065928。

相似文献

[1]
Comparative efficacy and safety of licensed treatments for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2018-7-25

[2]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[3]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-4-19

[4]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-12-22

[5]
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-1-9

[6]
First-line therapy for adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-5-4

[7]
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-5-4

[8]
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BMC Med. 2017-10-30

[9]
Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy compared to platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of older people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-8-13

[10]
Comparison of efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 combination therapy in first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Clin Transl Oncol. 2024-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
-FISH Evaluation Algorithm: Proposal of a Simplified Method.

J Cancer Sci Clin Ther. 2022

[2]
Immunotherapeutic Advances for NSCLC.

Biologics. 2021-10-8

[3]
Health-Related Quality of Life and Survival in Metastasized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with and without a Targetable Driver Mutation.

Cancers (Basel). 2021-8-25

[4]
A method for assessing robustness of the results of a star-shaped network meta-analysis under the unidentifiable consistency assumption.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021-6-1

[5]
Immuno-oncology-the new paradigm of lung cancer treatment.

Curr Oncol. 2020-4

[6]
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Licensed Drugs Used for Previously Treated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Negative Advanced/Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Clin Drug Investig. 2019-12

[7]
Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression: A Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study.

Shock. 2020-6

[8]
Comparative survival benefit of currently licensed second or third line treatments for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) negative advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and secondary analysis of trials.

BMC Cancer. 2019-4-25

本文引用的文献

[1]
Comparative efficacy and safety of second-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with wild-type or unknown status for epidermal growth factor receptor: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BMC Med. 2017-10-30

[2]
Indirect comparison between pembrolizumab and nivolumab for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Int Immunopharmacol. 2017-8

[3]
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2017-1-21

[4]
Pembrolizumab versus Chemotherapy for PD-L1-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

N Engl J Med. 2016-10-8

[5]
Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Ann Oncol. 2016-9

[6]
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2016-3-10

[7]
East Asian Subgroup Analysis of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of Docetaxel and Ramucirumab Versus Docetaxel and Placebo in the Treatment of Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Disease Progression after One Prior Platinum-Based Therapy (REVEL).

Cancer Res Treat. 2016-2-22

[8]
Impact of UGT1A1 genotype upon toxicities of combination with low-dose irinotecan plus platinum.

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016-6

[9]
Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2015-12-19

[10]
Anti-angiogenic-specific adverse events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nintedanib and docetaxel.

Lung Cancer. 2015-8-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索