Suppr超能文献

帕唑帕尼、索拉非尼和舒尼替尼治疗晚期软组织肉瘤患者的相关不良反应:一项汇总分析。

Treatment-related adverse effects with pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a pooled analysis.

作者信息

Que Yi, Liang Yao, Zhao Jingjing, Ding Ya, Peng Ruiqing, Guan Yuanxiang, Zhang Xing

机构信息

Department of Medical Melanoma and Sarcoma, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China,

Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China,

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Jul 19;10:2141-2150. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S164535. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Research efforts have investigated therapies targeting tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. We performed a pooled analysis to determine the frequency of severe adverse effects in patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated with pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid, the Cochrane Library and Embase databases from the drugs' inception to May 2017 to identify clinical trials. All-grade and severe adverse events (AEs; grade≥3) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 trials published between 2009 and 2016, including 843 patients, were eligible for analysis. We included 424 patients (three studies) who received pazopanib 800 mg daily, 353 patients (five studies) who received sorafenib 400 mg twice daily and 66 patients (two studies) who received sunitinib 37.5 mg daily. The incidence of AEs is different among the three VEGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Pazopanib showed higher incidence of all-grade nausea, diarrhea and hypertension compared with sorafenib and sunitinib. However, patients in the sorafenib group experienced a significantly higher frequency of all-grade rash (26.1%), hand-foot syndrome (33.4%) and mucositis (38.5%). The difference was highly significant for sorafenib vs. pazopanib in the incidence of all-grade rash (odds ratio [OR] 1.649, 95% CI 1.086-2.505, =0.023), hand-foot syndrome (OR 3.096, 95% CI 1.271-7.544, =0.009) and mucositis (OR 4.562, 95% CI 2.132-9.609, <0.001). Moreover, the frequency of grade ≥3 mucositis was significantly higher in the sunitinib group compared with the pazopanib or sorafenib group (7.6% vs. 1.3%, OR 6.448, 95% CI 1.499-27.731, =0.013).

CONCLUSION

Statistically significant differences in certain common adverse effects, such as all-grade and severe AEs, were detected among pazopanib, sorafenib and sunitinib in the current study. Early and prompt management is critically needed to avoid unnecessary dose reductions and treatment-related discontinuations.

摘要

目的

研究工作已对靶向酪氨酸激酶信号通路的疗法展开调查。我们进行了一项汇总分析,以确定接受帕唑帕尼、索拉非尼和舒尼替尼治疗的软组织肉瘤患者中严重不良反应的发生率。

材料与方法

我们对PubMed、科学网、Ovid、考克兰图书馆和Embase数据库进行了全面检索,检索时间从这些药物问世至2017年5月,以识别临床试验。对所有级别的和严重不良事件(AE;3级及以上)进行分析。

结果

共有2009年至2016年间发表的10项试验符合分析条件,包括843例患者。我们纳入了424例患者(3项研究),他们每日接受800 mg帕唑帕尼治疗;353例患者(5项研究),他们每日接受两次400 mg索拉非尼治疗;66例患者(2项研究),他们每日接受37.5 mg舒尼替尼治疗。三种血管内皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)的不良事件发生率有所不同。与索拉非尼和舒尼替尼相比,帕唑帕尼的所有级别恶心、腹泻和高血压发生率更高。然而,索拉非尼组患者所有级别皮疹(26.1%)、手足综合征(33.4%)和粘膜炎(38.5%)的发生率明显更高。索拉非尼与帕唑帕尼在所有级别皮疹发生率(优势比[OR] 1.649,95%置信区间1.086 - 2.505,P = 0.023)、手足综合征(OR 3.096,95%置信区间1.271 - 7.544,P = 0.009)和粘膜炎(OR 4.562,95%置信区间2.132 - 9.609,P < 0.001)方面的差异具有高度统计学意义。此外,舒尼替尼组3级及以上粘膜炎的发生率明显高于帕唑帕尼组或索拉非尼组(7.6%对1.3%,OR 6.448,95%置信区间1.499 - 27.731,P = 0.013)。

结论

在本研究中,帕唑帕尼、索拉非尼和舒尼替尼在某些常见不良反应(如所有级别和严重不良事件)方面存在统计学上的显著差异。迫切需要早期和及时的管理,以避免不必要的剂量减少和与治疗相关的停药。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9eb9/6055834/e00fdfed6788/cmar-10-2141Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验