Department of Neurology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 2-1-1 Minatojima-minamimachi, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0047, Japan.
Department of Neurology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaharacho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.
Seizure. 2018 Oct;61:23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
Previous studies on status epilepticus (SE) in the elderly were conducted in tertiary centers. We aimed to delineate the features and outcomes of elderly SE patients by comparing them to those of younger patients in a comprehensive community hospital providing primary to tertiary care.
We retrospectively investigated 197 consecutive adult SE patients admitted to our hospital. The clinical, electroencephalography, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) findings of 112 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) were compared to those of 85 younger patients (aged <65 years).
Compared to that in younger patients, SE in elderly patients more frequently presented de novo (68.8% vs. 52.9%, p = 0.02); was less likely to be tonic-clonic (55.4% vs. 83.5%, p < 0.001) but more likely to be focal motor (36.6% vs. 12.9%, p < 0.001); and was more frequently refractory (30.4% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.008), particularly refractory nonconvulsive SE (13.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.04). Lateralized periodic discharges on electroencephalography (20.9% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001) and SE-associated hyperintensities on DWI (27.8% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.03) were more common in the elderly than in the younger SE patients. The mortality rates did not significantly differ between the groups (6.3% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.52). The percentage of poor functional outcomes did not significantly differ between the groups in cases with acute symptomatic etiology (52.0% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.63), but was higher in elderly patients with remote symptomatic and cryptogenic etiologies (33.3% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.006).
SE in the elderly differed from that in younger adults in the semiology, refractoriness, electroencephalography and DWI findings, and functional outcome. Outcomes were better than previously reported.
先前关于老年人癫痫持续状态(SE)的研究是在三级中心进行的。我们旨在通过比较综合社区医院中接受初级至三级护理的老年患者与年轻患者的特征和结局,来描绘老年 SE 患者的特征。
我们回顾性调查了我院收治的 197 例成人 SE 患者。将 112 例年龄≥65 岁的老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)的临床、脑电图和弥散加权成像(DWI)结果与 85 例年龄<65 岁的年轻患者进行比较。
与年轻患者相比,老年患者的 SE 首发更常见(68.8%比 52.9%,p=0.02);更不可能是强直-阵挛性(55.4%比 83.5%,p<0.001),但更可能是局灶性运动性(36.6%比 12.9%,p<0.001);更易发生难治性(30.4%比 14.1%,p=0.008),特别是难治性非惊厥性 SE(13.4%比 4.7%,p=0.04)。脑电图上出现侧化周期性放电(20.9%比 4.8%,p=0.001)和 DWI 上出现 SE 相关高信号(27.8%比 13.6%,p=0.03)在老年患者中比在年轻 SE 患者中更常见。两组患者死亡率无显著差异(6.3%比 3.5%,p=0.52)。在急性症状性病因的病例中,两组患者的不良功能结局发生率无显著差异(52.0%比 45.7%,p=0.63),但在有远程症状性和隐源性病因的老年患者中,不良功能结局发生率更高(33.3%比 12.0%,p=0.006)。
与年轻成年人相比,老年 SE 在症状、难治性、脑电图和 DWI 表现以及功能结局方面存在差异。结局优于先前报道。