Ghosh Ritapa, Hazarika Naba Kumar
Vadodara Institute of Neurological Sciences, Vadodara, Gujarat; Department of Microbiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Department of Microbiology, Gauhati Medical College and Hospital, Guwahati; Lab Operations, HLL Hindlabs Diagnostic Centre, Assam, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2018 Apr-Jun;36(2):230-235. doi: 10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_17_238.
Dried blood spot (DBS) specimen simplifies blood collection, processing, storage and shipment and may reduce the cost of testing for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We wanted to see if DBS using a cheap filter paper is reliable alternative to serum for detection of anti-HCV and HCV RNA.
At a tertiary care hospital in Northeast India, we collected 91 paired DBS and serum specimens from patients at risk of HCV infection from July 2014 to June 2015. DBS was collected on Whatman No. 1 filter paper. After processing, the specimens were subjected to anti-HCV detection by a third-generation Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). The reactive DBS and serum specimens were further subjected to HCV RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction. The results were analysed in paired screen-positive study design.
Anti-HCV was detected in 9 (9.9%) DBS specimens and 10 (10.9%) serum specimens. There was statistically significant (P < 0.0001) correlation between the optical density values of DBS and serum specimens (Pearson r = 0.9181, 95% confidence interval: 0.8781-0.9453). HCV RNA was detected in 5/9 (55.6%) reactive DBS and 9/10 (90.0%) reactive serum specimens. There was no correlation between HCV RNA levels in the DBS and the serum specimens. The relative sensitivity rate and the relative false-positive rate of DBS anti-HCV ELISA were 0.89 and 1.00, respectively.
DBS using Whatman No. 1 filter paper is quite reliable as serum for detection of anti-HCV. It can be useful in effective surveillance. However, it is not suitable for confirmation of chronic HCV infection.
干血斑(DBS)标本简化了血液采集、处理、储存和运输过程,并且可能降低丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染检测的成本。我们想了解使用廉价滤纸的DBS是否是检测抗-HCV和HCV RNA的血清可靠替代物。
在印度东北部的一家三级护理医院,我们于2014年7月至2015年6月从有HCV感染风险的患者中收集了91对DBS和血清标本。DBS采集在Whatman No. 1滤纸上。处理后,标本通过第三代酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行抗-HCV检测。反应性DBS和血清标本进一步通过聚合酶链反应进行HCV RNA检测。结果在配对筛查阳性研究设计中进行分析。
在9份(9.9%)DBS标本和10份(10.9%)血清标本中检测到抗-HCV。DBS和血清标本的光密度值之间存在统计学显著相关性(P < 0.0001)(Pearson r = 0.9181,95%置信区间:0.8781 - 0.9453)。在5/9(55.6%)反应性DBS和9/10(90.0%)反应性血清标本中检测到HCV RNA。DBS和血清标本中的HCV RNA水平之间没有相关性。DBS抗-HCV ELISA的相对灵敏度率和相对假阳性率分别为0.89和1.00。
使用Whatman No. 1滤纸的DBS作为检测抗-HCV的血清相当可靠。它可用于有效的监测。然而,它不适合用于确认慢性HCV感染。