Rawlings Gregory
University of Otago.
20 Century Br Hist. 2019 Mar 1;30(1):53-80. doi: 10.1093/tcbh/hwy011.
The British Nationality Act (BNA) of 1948 was designed to provide a form of supranational citizenship to accommodate the separate nationality provisions that were beginning to proliferate as a result of constitutional change within the late empire, decolonization and the formation of the Commonwealth. Under the provisions of the BNA, members of the Commonwealth would continue to be unified by transnational forms of citizenship, at least in principle. The Act aimed to cover every political arrangement conceivable in the late empire and early Commonwealth and contributed to the transformation of Great Britain into a multicultural society, by providing the legal vehicle for immigration into the UK in the second half of the twentieth century. However, the BNA had its limits. It could not be applied to territories characterized by constitutional exceptionalism and jurisdictional hybridity. In the Condominium of the New Hebrides, jointly governed by France and Great Britain from 1906 to 1980, the majority of the indigenous population were unable to benefit from the BNA, despite efforts to extend its coverage in all eligible territories. As part of the condominium agreement, the indigenous population were ineligible for any form of citizenship-British, French or New Hebridean-and remained stateless until independence as the Republic of Vanuatu in 1980. This article examines the relationship between indigenous statelessness and the BNA, exploring the implementation, interpretation and extent of the BNA in a territory characterized by constitutional hybridity, compromise and ambiguity. It argues that despite its emphasis on universal commonwealth citizenship, the BNA could not accommodate the diverse political, legal and constitutional diversity that characterized the Dominions, Crown Colonies, protectorates, protected states and condominia that had proliferated under imperial rule and whose legacies continued to inform the possibilities for decolonization and the politics of post-colonial citizenship making.
1948年的《英国国籍法》旨在提供一种超国家公民身份形式,以适应由于帝国后期的宪法变革、非殖民化和英联邦的形成而开始激增的单独国籍规定。根据《英国国籍法》的规定,英联邦成员国至少在原则上仍将通过跨国公民身份形式保持统一。该法案旨在涵盖帝国后期和英联邦早期所有可以想象的政治安排,并通过为20世纪下半叶移民到英国提供法律途径,推动英国转变为一个多元文化社会。然而,《英国国籍法》也有其局限性。它不适用于具有宪法例外主义和管辖权混合特征的领土。在1906年至1980年由法国和英国共同治理的新赫布里底共管地,尽管努力将其覆盖范围扩大到所有符合条件的领土,但大多数原住民无法从《英国国籍法》中受益。作为共管地协议的一部分,原住民没有资格获得任何形式的公民身份——英国、法国或新赫布里底——并且一直处于无国籍状态,直到1980年独立成为瓦努阿图共和国。本文探讨了原住民无国籍状态与《英国国籍法》之间的关系,考察了该法案在一个具有宪法混合、妥协和模糊特征的领土上的实施、解释和范围。文章认为,尽管《英国国籍法》强调普遍的英联邦公民身份,但它无法适应在帝国统治下激增且其遗产继续影响非殖民化可能性和后殖民公民身份政治的自治领、直辖殖民地、保护国、受保护国和共管地所具有的多样的政治、法律和宪法多样性。