Thanopoulos Vassilis, Psarou Eleni, Vatakis Argiro
Department of Philosophy and History of Science, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; Cognitive Systems Research Institute, Athens, Greece.
Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Frankfurt, Germany.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Oct;190:159-173. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
Past studies have shown that when a voluntary action produces a sensory effect, the action and the effect will be perceived as being closer in time. This subjective temporal 'attraction' is known as intentional binding (IB). Induction of IB is dependent on the intentionality of one's actions, the predictability of the effect, and the causality between the action and the effect. Previous investigations of IB have utilized abstract stimuli (e.g., flashes and beeps) with adaptation so as to associate the abstract action-effect link. Yet, events from our everyday experiences already have an inherent action-effect link. We, thus, investigated, for the first time, IB under naturalistic, multisensory stimulation by manipulating the intentionality, predictability, and causal event link. A total of five experiments without adaptation were conducted examining IB with: abstract stimuli (Experiment 1), naturalistic effects (Exp. 2), naturalistic action cue and effect matching (Exp. 3), naturalistic action cue and effect mismatching (Exp. 4), and naturalistic action cue and effect matching but mismatched response mapping (Exp. 5). Analyses of the data showed the absence of IB for abstract stimuli without action-effect adaptation (Exp. 1) and for effects that were not inherently causal or predictable of one's action (Exp. 2, 4, and 5). IB, however, was induced when the naturalistic sequence of action cue-effect was casually linked and predictable in terms of timing (Exp. 3). Overall, our results showed that induction of IB is dependent on the inherent causal and predictable association of an event from the cue to act to the consequence of that action, an association that is already present in everyday multisensory events.
过去的研究表明,当一个自发行为产生一种感官效应时,该行为和效应在时间上会被感知得更近。这种主观的时间“吸引”被称为意向联结(IB)。IB的诱发取决于一个人行为的意向性、效应的可预测性以及行为与效应之间的因果关系。先前对IB的研究利用了带有适应的抽象刺激(如闪光和蜂鸣声),以便将抽象的行为-效应联系起来。然而,我们日常经历中的事件已经存在固有的行为-效应联系。因此,我们首次通过操纵意向性、可预测性和因果事件联系,在自然主义的多感官刺激下研究了IB。总共进行了五个无适应的实验,分别用以下方式检验IB:抽象刺激(实验1)、自然主义效应(实验2)、自然主义行为线索与效应匹配(实验3)、自然主义行为线索与效应不匹配(实验4),以及自然主义行为线索与效应匹配但反应映射不匹配(实验5)。数据分析表明,对于没有行为-效应适应的抽象刺激(实验1)以及对于那些本质上没有因果关系或无法由一个人的行为预测的效应(实验2、4和5),不存在IB。然而,当自然主义的行为线索-效应序列在时间上具有因果联系且可预测时,会诱发IB(实验3)。总体而言,我们的结果表明,IB的诱发取决于从行为线索到行为后果的事件之间固有的因果和可预测关联,这种关联在日常多感官事件中已然存在。