From the Department of Neurology (G.T., N.G., A.K., R.K., A.P., P.D., A.D., R.B.S., T.B., K.N., B.C., J.C., R.Z., A.W.A., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis; Second Department of Neurology (G.T., A.H.K.), Attikon University General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Department of Neurology (K.M.), West Virginia University-Charleston Division; Department of Critical Care Medicine (J.C.), MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; and Department of Neurology (R.Z.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA.
Neurology. 2018 Sep 11;91(11):e1067-e1076. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study.
We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality.
Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 ± 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes.
DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates.
This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk.
我们旨在通过一项前瞻性多中心研究,确定急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者在预先接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPP)的情况下进行静脉溶栓(IVT)的安全性和有效性。
我们比较了 DAPP+和 DAPP-IVT 治疗的患者在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的以下结局:症状性颅内出血(sICH)、无症状性颅内出血、良好的功能结局(改良Rankin 量表评分 0-1)和 3 个月死亡率。
在 790 例 IVT 患者中,58 例(7%)在卒中前使用 DAPP(平均年龄 68±13 岁;57%为男性;NIH 卒中量表评分中位数为 8)。与 DAPP-患者相比,DAPP+患者年龄更大,且存在更多的危险因素。两组 sICH 发生率相似(3.4%比 3.2%)。在调整潜在混杂因素的多变量分析中,DAPP 与无症状性颅内出血的发生几率更高相关(比值比=3.53,95%置信区间:1.47-8.47;=0.005),但也与 3 个月时良好的功能结局的可能性更高相关(比值比=2.41,95%置信区间:1.06-5.46;=0.035)。经过倾向评分匹配,41 例 DAPP+患者与 82 例 DAPP-患者匹配。两组在基线特征或安全性和疗效结局方面均无差异。
DAPP 与 IVT 后 sICH 和 3 个月死亡率的升高无关。对于符合 IVT 条件的 AIS 患者,DAPP 不应成为拒绝 IVT 的理由。
本研究提供了 III 级证据,表明对于接受 IVT 治疗的 AIS 患者,DAPP 与 sICH 风险的显著增加无关。本研究缺乏排除 sICH 出血风险增加的精度。