Suppr超能文献

急性缺血性脑卒中静脉溶栓治疗中的双重抗血小板预处理。

Dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

机构信息

From the Department of Neurology (G.T., N.G., A.K., R.K., A.P., P.D., A.D., R.B.S., T.B., K.N., B.C., J.C., R.Z., A.W.A., A.V.A.), University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis; Second Department of Neurology (G.T., A.H.K.), Attikon University General Hospital, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece; Department of Neurology (K.M.), West Virginia University-Charleston Division; Department of Critical Care Medicine (J.C.), MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC; and Department of Neurology (R.Z.), Geisinger Health System, Danville, PA.

出版信息

Neurology. 2018 Sep 11;91(11):e1067-e1076. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006168. Epub 2018 Aug 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with a history of dual antiplatelet therapy pretreatment (DAPP) in a prospective multicenter study.

METHODS

We compared the following outcomes between DAPP+ and DAPP- IVT-treated patients before and after propensity score matching (PSM): symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, favorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1), and 3-month mortality.

RESULTS

Among 790 IVT patients, 58 (7%) were on DAPP before stroke (mean age 68 ± 13 years; 57% men; median NIH Stroke Scale score 8). DAPP+ patients were older with more risk factors compared to DAPP- patients. The rates of sICH were similar between groups (3.4% vs 3.2%). In multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders, DAPP was associated with higher odds of asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio = 3.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.47-8.47; = 0.005) but also with a higher likelihood of 3-month favorable functional outcome (odds ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-5.46; = 0.035). After propensity score matching, 41 DAPP+ patients were matched to 82 DAPP- patients. The 2 groups did not differ in any of the baseline characteristics or safety and efficacy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

DAPP is not associated with higher rates of sICH and 3-month mortality following IVT. DAPP should not be used as a reason to withhold IVT in otherwise eligible AIS candidates.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that for IVT-treated patients with AIS, DAPP is not associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH. The study lacked the precision to exclude a potentially meaningful increase in sICH bleeding risk.

摘要

目的

我们旨在通过一项前瞻性多中心研究,确定急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者在预先接受双联抗血小板治疗(DAPP)的情况下进行静脉溶栓(IVT)的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们比较了 DAPP+和 DAPP-IVT 治疗的患者在倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的以下结局:症状性颅内出血(sICH)、无症状性颅内出血、良好的功能结局(改良Rankin 量表评分 0-1)和 3 个月死亡率。

结果

在 790 例 IVT 患者中,58 例(7%)在卒中前使用 DAPP(平均年龄 68±13 岁;57%为男性;NIH 卒中量表评分中位数为 8)。与 DAPP-患者相比,DAPP+患者年龄更大,且存在更多的危险因素。两组 sICH 发生率相似(3.4%比 3.2%)。在调整潜在混杂因素的多变量分析中,DAPP 与无症状性颅内出血的发生几率更高相关(比值比=3.53,95%置信区间:1.47-8.47;=0.005),但也与 3 个月时良好的功能结局的可能性更高相关(比值比=2.41,95%置信区间:1.06-5.46;=0.035)。经过倾向评分匹配,41 例 DAPP+患者与 82 例 DAPP-患者匹配。两组在基线特征或安全性和疗效结局方面均无差异。

结论

DAPP 与 IVT 后 sICH 和 3 个月死亡率的升高无关。对于符合 IVT 条件的 AIS 患者,DAPP 不应成为拒绝 IVT 的理由。

证据分类

本研究提供了 III 级证据,表明对于接受 IVT 治疗的 AIS 患者,DAPP 与 sICH 风险的显著增加无关。本研究缺乏排除 sICH 出血风险增加的精度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验