Byrne Benjamin E, Bassett Michael, Rogers Chris A, Anderson Iain D, Beckingham Ian, Blazeby Jane M
Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
National Emergency Laparotomy Audit, The Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 20;8(8):e023721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023721.
This study used national audit data to describe current management and outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for complications of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), including perforation and bleeding. It was also planned to explore factors associated with fatal outcome after surgery for perforated ulcers. These analyses were designed to provide a thorough understanding of current practice and identify potentially modifiable factors associated with outcome as targets for future quality improvement.
National cohort study using National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) data.
English and Welsh hospitals within the National Health Service.
Adult patients admitted as an emergency with perforated or bleeding PUD between December 2013 and November 2015.
Laparotomy for bleeding or perforated peptic ulcer.
The primary outcome was 60-day in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included length of postoperative stay, readmission and reoperation rate.
2444 and 382 procedures were performed for perforated and bleeding ulcers, respectively. In-hospital 60-day mortality rates were 287/2444 (11.7%, 95% CI 10.5% to 13.1%) for perforations, and 68/382 (17.8%, 95% CI 14.1% to 22.0%) for bleeding. Median (IQR) 2-year institutional volume was 12 (7-17) and 2 (1-3) for perforation and bleeding, respectively. In the exploratory analysis, age, American Society of Anesthesiology score and preoperative systolic blood pressure were associated with mortality, with no association with time from admission to operation, surgeon grade or operative approach.
Patients undergoing surgery for complicated PUD face a high 60-day mortality risk. Exploratory analyses suggested fatal outcome was primarily associated with patient rather than provider care factors. Therefore, it may be challenging to reduce mortality rates further. NELA data provide important benchmarking for patient consent and has highlighted low institutional volume and high mortality rates after surgery for bleeding peptic ulcers as a target for future research and improvement.
本研究利用国家审计数据描述因消化性溃疡疾病(PUD)并发症(包括穿孔和出血)接受手术患者的当前管理情况及治疗结果。同时计划探讨穿孔性溃疡手术后与致命结局相关的因素。这些分析旨在全面了解当前的治疗实践,并确定与结局相关的潜在可改变因素,作为未来质量改进的目标。
使用国家急诊剖腹手术审计(NELA)数据进行全国队列研究。
英国国民医疗服务体系内的英格兰和威尔士医院。
2013年12月至2015年11月期间因穿孔或出血性PUD作为急诊入院的成年患者。
针对出血性或穿孔性消化性溃疡进行剖腹手术。
主要结局为60天住院死亡率。次要结局包括术后住院时间、再入院率和再次手术率。
分别对2444例穿孔性溃疡和382例出血性溃疡进行了手术。穿孔性溃疡的60天住院死亡率为287/2444(11.7%,95%可信区间10.5%至13.1%),出血性溃疡为68/382(17.8%,95%可信区间14.1%至22.0%)。穿孔性溃疡和出血性溃疡的2年机构手术量中位数(四分位间距)分别为12(7-17)和2(1-3)。在探索性分析中,年龄、美国麻醉医师协会评分和术前收缩压与死亡率相关,与入院至手术的时间、外科医生级别或手术方式无关。
因复杂性PUD接受手术的患者面临较高的60天死亡风险。探索性分析表明,致命结局主要与患者因素而非医疗服务提供者因素相关。因此,进一步降低死亡率可能具有挑战性。NELA数据为患者知情同意提供了重要的基准,并突出显示出血性消化性溃疡手术后机构手术量低和死亡率高是未来研究和改进的目标。