Suppr超能文献

经颅直流电刺激与呼吸控制电刺激联合应用治疗脊髓损伤后神经病理性疼痛。

Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and breathing-controlled electrical stimulation for management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.

机构信息

PMR, UTHealth, , 77025 Houston, USA.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2018 Sep 28;50(9):814-820. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2379.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether transcranial direct current stimulation augments the analgesic effect of breathing-controlled electrical stimulation in patients with spinal cord injury who have chronic neuropathic pain.

DESIGN

Sham-controlled, single-blinded, single-centre, cross-over study of 12 participants with incomplete spinal cord injury. The treatment protocol included a 20-min transcranial direct current stimulation (sham or active), followed by a 20-min breathing-controlled electrical stimulation to the median nerve on the dominant side. The treatment session with sham or control transcranial direct current stimulation was given on different days in a randomized order. Visual analogue scale was used to assess neuropathic pain at baseline, 10 min after transcranial direct current stimulation, and 10 min after breathing-controlled electrical stimulation.

RESULTS

Participants were blinded to the status of transcranial direct current stimulation. Out of the 12 participants, 10 completed sessions of both sham and active transcranial direct current stimulation, while the other 2 completed only active transcranial direct current stimulation and breathing-controlled electrical stimulation treatment. Out of the 12 participants, 7 showed analgesic effects after active transcranial direct current stimulation, while sham transcranial direct current stimulation produced some analgesic effects in 4 out of 10 participants. At the group level, there was no difference between active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. All except one participant responded positively to breathing-controlled electrical stimulation in all sessions. Visual analogue scale score for pain decreased significantly after breathing-controlled electrical stimulation combined with either active transcranial direct current stimulation or sham transcranial direct current stimulation treatment.

CONCLUSION

The immediate analgesic effect of breathing-controlled electrical stimulation was confirmed. However, this effect was not augmented after one session of transcranial direct current stimulation treatment.

摘要

目的

确定经颅直流电刺激是否能增强慢性神经性疼痛的脊髓损伤患者呼吸控制电刺激的镇痛效果。

设计

12 名不完全性脊髓损伤参与者参与的假对照、单盲、单中心、交叉研究。治疗方案包括 20 分钟经颅直流电刺激(假刺激或真刺激),随后在优势侧正中神经上进行 20 分钟呼吸控制电刺激。假刺激或对照经颅直流电刺激的治疗疗程以随机顺序在不同天进行。视觉模拟评分用于评估基线时、经颅直流电刺激后 10 分钟和呼吸控制电刺激后 10 分钟的神经性疼痛。

结果

参与者对经颅直流电刺激的状态不知情。12 名参与者中有 10 名完成了假刺激和真刺激的全部疗程,而另外 2 名仅完成了真刺激和呼吸控制电刺激的治疗。12 名参与者中有 7 名在真刺激后表现出镇痛效果,而假刺激在 10 名参与者中有 4 名产生了一些镇痛效果。在组水平上,真刺激和假刺激治疗之间没有差异。除了 1 名参与者外,所有参与者在所有疗程中对呼吸控制电刺激均有积极反应。视觉模拟评分在呼吸控制电刺激联合真刺激或假刺激治疗后显著降低。

结论

证实了呼吸控制电刺激的即时镇痛效果。然而,在单次经颅直流电刺激治疗后,这种效果没有增强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验