Uludag University.
University of Houston, Clear Lake.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2018 Oct;51(4):757-768. doi: 10.1002/jaba.497. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of response interruption and redirection (RIRD) for reducing vocal stereotypy in children with autism. However, the procedure can be time-consuming to implement. Results of Saini, Gregory, Uran, and Fantetti (2015) suggested that an abbreviated variation of RIRD was just as effective as the commonly used variation of RIRD, but further research is needed. In addition, no studies have evaluated the role of toy removal on the efficacy of RIRD even though this procedural component is frequently combined with RIRD. We examined the separate and combined effects of RIRD and contingent toy removal when three children with autism were required to respond to one demand versus three demands. One-demand RIRD was effective for all participants, and the contingent removal of toys alone reduced responding for two of three participants. Findings have important implications for treating vocal stereotypy in relevant settings.
许多研究已经证明,反应中断和重定向(RIRD)对于减少自闭症儿童的声音刻板行为非常有效。然而,实施该程序可能很耗时。Saini、Gregory、Uran 和 Fantetti(2015)的研究结果表明,RIRD 的简化变体与常用的 RIRD 变体一样有效,但还需要进一步研究。此外,尽管该程序组件经常与 RIRD 结合使用,但没有研究评估玩具移除对 RIRD 效果的作用。当三个自闭症儿童被要求对一个要求与三个要求做出反应时,我们研究了 RIRD 和 contingent 玩具移除的单独和联合作用。单一需求的 RIRD 对所有参与者都有效,而单独的 contingent 移除玩具则减少了三个参与者中的两个的反应。这些发现对在相关环境中治疗声音刻板行为具有重要意义。