Diagnostic radiology resident perspectives on fellowship training and career interest in emergency radiology.

PURPOSE

(1) Evaluate radiology resident perception of emergency radiology (ER). (2) Identify potential barriers to pursuing fellowship training or a career in ER among radiology residents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 9-question digital survey was designed using Qualtrics Experience Management software (Qualtrics Inc., Provo, UT) and distributed to all US radiology residents via a multi-pronged distribution approach.

RESULTS

Four hundred fifty-one residents responded out of an estimated national total of 4432 residents (10.2%). Gender proportion was nationally representative (female = 24.5%; p = 0.57), with a slight R1 predominance (p = 0.034). Of the residents, 88.8% were aware that an ER subspecialty exists, 82.0% were aware that ER fellowships exist, but only 51.7% were aware that the American Society of Emergency Radiology (ASER) exists. Nearly a quarter reported no ER division or ER resident rotation. Residents in a program without an ER division or rotation were nearly twice as likely to be unaware of the existence of ER subspecialty, ER fellowships, and ASER compared to others (p = 0.017). The presence of an ER division and rotation significantly increases the knowledge of ASER (65.5% vs. 40.7%, p < 0.001) and increases residents' ratings of their ER training (p < 0.001). The following factors were ranked as the most important for fellowship choice: (1) personal interest, (2) intellectually stimulating, and (3) work hours. When asked if ER had an appealing work schedule, the mean response was 56 out of 100 (0 = disagree, 100 = agree).

CONCLUSION

US radiology residents with the greatest exposure to ER during residency are more familiar with ER training, ER career opportunities, and ASER and had a more favorable perception of the field. Subspecialty leaders should focus on ER's inherent intellectual appeal and reframe its nontraditional schedule as positive (flexible).