• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分娩期宫颈裂伤及其对未来妊娠结局的影响。

Intrapartum cervical lacerations and their impact on future pregnancy outcome.

作者信息

Hamou Batel, Sheiner Eyal, Coreanu Tara, Walfisch Asnat, Silberstein Tali

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Department of Medicine and Clinical Research Center, Soroka University Medical Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

出版信息

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Mar;33(5):883-887. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1505852. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1080/14767058.2018.1505852
PMID:30189764
Abstract

To investigate the significance of intrapartum cervical lacerations on subsequent pregnancies. A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted, comparing outcomes of subsequent singleton pregnancies, in women with and without a history of cervical lacerations in a previous delivery. Deliveries occurred between the years 1991-2014 at the Soroka University Medical Center. Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to control for clinically significant confounders. During the study period 187,162 deliveries met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 429 (0.2%) occurred in women with a history of cervical lacerations in the previous pregnancy (study group). The study group exhibited significantly higher rates of recurrent cervical lacerations (21/429, 4.9% versus 275/187 162,0.1%, value = .001), cerclage (13/429, 3% versus 260/187 162, 0.1% value = .001), cervical incompetence (8/429, 1.9% versus 609/187 162, 0.3% value = .001) cesarean delivery (CD) (97/429, 22.6% versus 26 280/187 162,14%, value = .001), severe perineal tears (third or fourth degree; 2/429, 0.5%, versus 164/187 162, 0.1%, value = .056) and blood transfusion (11/429, 2.6% versus 2448/187 162, 1.3%, value = .022) as compared with the comparison group. Using a multivariable logistic regression model, history of cervical laceration in a previous pregnancy was found to be an independent risk factor for subsequent CD (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.9), recurrent cervical laceration (OR 29.3, 95% CI 17.7-48.5), severe perineal lacerations (OR 11.7, 95% CI 5.1-27.2), and preterm delivery (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-2.8) in the subsequent pregnancy. A history of intrapartum cervical laceration is an independent risk factor for recurrent cervical lacerations, CD, preterm delivery, and severe perineal lacerations in the subsequent pregnancy.

摘要

为研究产时宫颈裂伤对后续妊娠的影响。我们进行了一项回顾性队列分析,比较既往有或无宫颈裂伤史的女性后续单胎妊娠的结局。分娩发生在1991年至2014年期间的索罗卡大学医学中心。构建了多个逻辑回归模型以控制具有临床意义的混杂因素。在研究期间,187162例分娩符合纳入标准。其中,429例(0.2%)发生在既往妊娠有宫颈裂伤史的女性中(研究组)。与对照组相比,研究组复发性宫颈裂伤(21/429,4.9% 对比 275/187162,0.1%,P值 = 0.001)、宫颈环扎术(13/429,3% 对比 260/187162,0.1%,P值 = 0.001)、宫颈机能不全(8/429,1.9% 对比 609/187162,0.3%,P值 = 0.001)、剖宫产(CD)(97/429,22.6% 对比 26280/187162,14%,P值 = 0.001)、严重会阴裂伤(三度或四度;2/429,0.5%,对比 164/187162,0.1%,P值 = 0.056)及输血(11/429,2.6% 对比 2448/187162,1.3%,P值 = 0.022)的发生率显著更高。使用多变量逻辑回归模型发现,既往妊娠宫颈裂伤史是后续妊娠发生CD(比值比1.4,95%可信区间1.1 - 1.9)、复发性宫颈裂伤(比值比29.3,95%可信区间17.7 - 48.5)、严重会阴裂伤(比值比11.7,95%可信区间5.1 - 27.2)及早产(比值比1.8,95%可信区间1.1 - 2.8)的独立危险因素。产时宫颈裂伤史是后续妊娠复发性宫颈裂伤、剖宫产、早产及严重会阴裂伤的独立危险因素。

相似文献

1
Intrapartum cervical lacerations and their impact on future pregnancy outcome.分娩期宫颈裂伤及其对未来妊娠结局的影响。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Mar;33(5):883-887. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1505852. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
2
Intrapartum cervical lacerations: characteristics, risk factors, and effects on subsequent pregnancies.分娩期宫颈裂伤:特征、危险因素及其对后续妊娠的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):388.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.10.034. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in perineal, vaginal and cervical lacerations.会阴、阴道和宫颈裂伤的种族/民族差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug;193(2):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.007.
4
Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage.接受宫颈环扎术的女性发生产时宫颈裂伤的风险。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Feb;26(3):294-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2012.733755. Epub 2012 Oct 29.
5
Term Labor Outcomes after Cerclage Placement in a Multi-institutional Cohort.多机构队列中宫颈环扎术后足月分娩结局
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Jan;37(1):119-126. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401851. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
6
Characteristics associated with severe perineal and cervical lacerations during vaginal delivery.与阴道分娩时会阴和宫颈严重裂伤相关的特征。
Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Mar;117(3):627-635. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820afaf2.
7
Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.第二产程时长及器械助产作为严重会阴裂伤的危险因素:基于人群的研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 21;17(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1251-6.
8
Cervical lacerations: some surprising facts.宫颈裂伤:一些惊人的事实。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;196(5):e17-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.11.043.
9
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.预测现代产科人群中的产科肛门括约肌损伤
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
10
Epidural Analgesia and Any Vaginal Laceration.硬膜外镇痛与任何阴道裂伤。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):768-773. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170400.

引用本文的文献

1
Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes Following Prepregnancy Cerclage in Patients with Absent Ecto-Cervix.宫颈外口缺失患者孕前宫颈环扎术后的后续妊娠结局
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Nov;53(11):2500-2508. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i11.16953.
2
Porcine stomach surgical simulation model for cesarean section and cervical laceration suturing.猪胃剖宫产和宫颈裂伤缝合手术模拟模型。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):1024. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05936-8.
3
Risk of cervical laceration in forceps vs vacuum delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
产钳与真空吸引助产分娩时宫颈裂伤的风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 Jan;104(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14969. Epub 2024 Sep 15.
4
Prevalence and associated factors of maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.2022 年,在埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学综合专科医院,阴道分娩后产妇分娩创伤的流行情况及相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06635-4.
5
Early Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements and Prediction of Second Trimester Pregnancy Loss: a Nomogram Model Analysis.孕中期妊娠丢失的早期磁共振成像测量及预测:列线图模型分析
Int J Womens Health. 2024 May 14;16:819-827. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S453867. eCollection 2024.
6
An intrapartum cervical buttonhole tear: A case report and review of rare tear pathogenesis.产时宫颈钮孔状撕裂:一例病例报告及罕见撕裂发病机制综述
Case Rep Womens Health. 2023 May 23;38:e00516. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2023.e00516. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Spontaneous preterm birth: Involvement of multiple feto-maternal tissues and organ systems, differing mechanisms, and pathways.自发性早产:涉及多种胎儿-母体组织和器官系统,不同的机制和途径。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;13:1015622. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1015622. eCollection 2022.
8
Childbirth resulting in traumatic stretching and prolapsing of the anterior lip of the cervix outside the vagina: A case report.分娩导致宫颈前唇在阴道外发生创伤性拉伸和脱垂:一例报告。
Case Rep Womens Health. 2022 Apr 15;34:e00411. doi: 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00411. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Preterm Delivery; Who Is at Risk?早产;哪些人有风险?
J Clin Med. 2021 May 24;10(11):2279. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112279.