Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, Sansom Institute for Health Research, School of Health Sciences, Universitiy of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
School of Health Sciences, Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Sep 6;18(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0711-8.
Despite the known occupational hazards, it is not yet clear whether long-term career firefighting leads to a greater rate of decline in lung function than would normally be expected, and how this rate of change is affected by firefighting exposures and other risk/protective factors.
A systematic search of online electronic databases was conducted to identify longitudinal studies reporting on the rate of change in the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV) of forced vital capacity (FVC). Included studies were critically appraised to determine their risk of bias using the Research Triangle Institute Item Bank (RTI-IB) on Risk of Bias and Precision of Observational Studies.
Twenty-two studies were identified for inclusion, from four different countries, published between 1974 and 2016. Examined separately, studies were categorised by the type of firefighting exposure. Firefighters experienced variable rates of decline in lung function, which were particularly influenced by cigarette smoking. The influence of routine firefighting exposures is unclear and limited by the methods of measurement, while firefighters exposed to 'non-routine' severe exposures unanimously experienced accelerated declines.
The data provided by longitudinal studies provide an unclear picture of how the rate of change in lung function of firefighters relates to routine exposures and how it compares to the rate of change expected in a working-age population. Non-smoking firefighters who routinely wear respiratory protection are more likely than otherwise to have a normal rate of decline in lung function. Exposure to catastrophic events significantly increases the rate of decline in firefighter lung function but there is limited evidence detailing the effect of routine firefighting. Future studies will benefit from more robust methods of measuring exposure.
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number ( CRD42017058499 ).
尽管已知职业危害,但长期职业消防工作是否会导致肺功能下降速度高于预期,以及这种变化速度如何受到消防暴露和其他风险/保护因素的影响,目前仍不清楚。
系统检索在线电子数据库,以确定报告用力肺活量(FVC)一秒用力呼气量(FEV)变化率的纵向研究。使用研究三角研究院(RTI)项目库(RTI-IB)对纳入的研究进行批判性评估,以确定其偏倚风险和观察研究的精确性。
从四个不同的国家确定了 22 项研究,发表时间为 1974 年至 2016 年。单独检查时,研究按消防暴露的类型进行分类。消防员的肺功能下降速度不同,受吸烟影响尤为明显。常规消防暴露的影响尚不清楚,且受到测量方法的限制,而暴露于“非常规”严重暴露的消防员则一致经历了加速下降。
纵向研究提供的数据提供了一个不清楚的情况,即消防员肺功能变化率与常规暴露的关系,以及与工作年龄人群的预期变化率相比如何。不吸烟且常规佩戴呼吸保护装置的消防员肺功能下降速度更有可能正常。灾难性事件的暴露会显著增加消防员肺功能下降的速度,但详细描述常规消防暴露影响的证据有限。未来的研究将受益于更强大的暴露测量方法。
国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO),注册号(CRD42017058499)。