Suppr超能文献

选择的暴政:未来的生殖选择

The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future.

作者信息

Suter Sonia M

机构信息

Law School, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

出版信息

J Law Biosci. 2018 Aug 1;5(2):262-300. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsy014. eCollection 2018 Aug.

Abstract

This article explores the enormous challenges to reproductive decision making that could result from two emerging technologies: the potential capacity to create vast numbers of embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the ability to obtain ever more predictive information about the embryo. Together these technologies could change our reproductive experience, exacerbate existing inequities, and profoundly affect reproductive decision making. Simply comprehending the dizzying amounts of predictive information about the health and traits of future children will overwhelm future parents. But trying to choose embryos with the 'best' combination of genetic variants could be paralyzing. Nevertheless, numerous pressures will make this technology alluring, compelling providers to develop remedies to assist future parents with these difficult reproductive decisions. The remedies, however, will create their own challenges. Some might test the limits of reproductive autonomy and heighten social inequities. A particularly vexing remedy would be the development of algorithms for embryo selection, which could routinize reproductive decisions, reduce societal diversity, exacerbate 'choice overload' effects, challenge professional norms, and raise the specter of eugenics. Ultimately, this article is a cautionary tale urging circumspection as technological advancements seem to propel us inevitably toward a reproductive future that could create a tyranny of choice.

摘要

本文探讨了两项新兴技术可能给生殖决策带来的巨大挑战

为植入前基因诊断创造大量胚胎的潜在能力,以及获取关于胚胎的更多预测性信息的能力。这两项技术加在一起可能会改变我们的生殖体验,加剧现有的不平等现象,并深刻影响生殖决策。仅仅理解关于未来孩子健康和特征的大量预测性信息,就会让未来的父母不堪重负。但试图选择具有“最佳”基因变异组合的胚胎可能会让人陷入瘫痪。然而,众多压力将使这项技术具有吸引力,促使提供者开发补救措施,以帮助未来的父母做出这些艰难的生殖决策。然而,这些补救措施也会带来它们自身的挑战。有些可能会考验生殖自主权的界限,并加剧社会不平等。一种特别棘手的补救措施将是开发胚胎选择算法,这可能会使生殖决策常规化,减少社会多样性,加剧“选择过载”效应,挑战专业规范,并引发优生学的幽灵。最终,本文是一个警示故事,敦促人们谨慎行事,因为技术进步似乎不可避免地将我们推向一个可能造成选择暴政的生殖未来。

相似文献

1
The tyranny of choice: reproductive selection in the future.选择的暴政:未来的生殖选择
J Law Biosci. 2018 Aug 1;5(2):262-300. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsy014. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
National mosaic embryo transfer practices: a survey.全国马赛克胚胎移植实践:一项调查。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):602.e1-602.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.030. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and reproductive autonomy.胚胎植入前遗传学诊断与生殖自主权。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;19 Suppl 2:34-42. doi: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60275-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验