Division of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Lancet. 2018 Sep 1;392(10149):747-759. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31487-9.
BACKGROUND: People who inject drugs (PWID) have a high incidence of HIV, little access to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and medication-assisted treatment (MAT), and high mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a future controlled trial based on the incidence of HIV, enrolment, retention, and uptake of the intervention, and the efficacy of an integrated and flexible intervention on ART use, viral suppression, and MAT use. METHODS: This randomised, controlled vanguard study was run in Kyiv, Ukraine (one community site), Thai Nguyen, Vietnam (two district health centre sites), and Jakarta, Indonesia (one hospital site). PWID who were HIV infected (index participants) and non-infected injection partners were recruited as PWID network units and were eligible for screening if they were aged 18-45 years (updated to 18-60 years 8 months into study), and active injection drug users. Further eligibility criteria for index participants included a viral load of 1000 copies per mL or higher, willingness and ability to recruit at least one injection partner who would be willing to participate. Index participants were randomly assigned via a computer generated sequence accessed through a secure web portal (3:1) to standard of care or intervention, stratified by site. Masking of assignment was not possible due to the nature of intervention. The intervention comprised systems navigation, psychosocial counselling, and ART at any CD4 count. Local ART and MAT services were used. Participants were followed up for 12-24 months. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial. To achieve this aim we looked at the following endpoints: HIV incidence among injection partners in the standard of care group, and enrolment and retention of HIV-infected PWID and their injection partners and the uptake of the integrated intervention. The study was also designed to assess the feasibility, barriers, and uptake of the integrated intervention. Endpoints were assessed in a modified intention-to-treat popualtion after exclusion of ineligible participants. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02935296, and is active but not recruiting new participants. FINDINGS: Between Feb 5, 2015, and June 3, 2016, 3343 potential index participants were screened, of whom 502 (15%) were eligible and enrolled. 1171 injection partners were referred, and 806 (69%) were eligible and enrolled. Index participants were randomly assigned to intervention (126 [25%]) and standard of care (376 [75%]) groups. At week 52, most living index participants (389 [86%] of 451) and partners (567 [80%] of 710) were retained, and self-reported ART use was higher among index participants in the intervention group than those in the standard of care group (probability ratio [PR] 1·7, 95% CI 1·4-1·9). Viral suppression was also higher in the intervention group than in the standard of care group (PR 1·7, 95% CI 1·3-2·2). Index participants in the intervention group reported more MAT use at 52 weeks than those in the standard of care group (PR 1·7, 95% CI 1·3-2·2). Seven incident HIV infections occurred, and all in injection partners in the standard of care group (intervention incidence 0·0 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0·0-1·7; standard of care incidence 1·0 per 100 person-years, 95% CI 0·4-2·1; incidence rate difference -1·0 per 100 person-years, 95% CI -2·1 to 1·1). No severe adverse events due to the intervention were recorded. INTERPRETATION: This vanguard study provides evidence that a flexible, scalable intervention increases ART and MAT use and reduces mortality among PWID. The low incidence of HIV in both groups impedes a future randomised, controlled trial, but given the strength of the effect of the intervention, its implementation among HIV-infected PWID should be considered. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health.
背景:注射吸毒者(PWID)的 HIV 发病率较高,获得抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)和药物辅助治疗(MAT)的机会有限,死亡率较高。我们旨在评估一项基于 HIV 发病率、入组、保留和干预措施的接受程度以及综合和灵活干预措施对 ART 使用、病毒抑制和 MAT 使用效果的未来对照试验的可行性。
方法:这项随机对照先锋研究在乌克兰基辅(一个社区地点)、越南太原(两个区卫生中心地点)和印度尼西亚雅加达(一个医院地点)进行。感染 HIV 的 PWID(索引参与者)和未感染的注射伙伴被招募为 PWID 网络单位,如果他们年龄在 18-45 岁(研究进行到 8 个月时更新为 18-60 岁)且为活跃的注射吸毒者,则有资格接受筛查。索引参与者的进一步入选标准包括病毒载量为 1000 拷贝/毫升或更高,愿意并有能力招募至少一名愿意参与的注射伙伴。索引参与者通过安全网络门户(3:1)随机分配到标准护理或干预组,按地点分层。由于干预措施的性质,无法进行分配的掩蔽。干预措施包括系统导航、心理社会咨询和任何 CD4 计数的 ART。使用当地的 ART 和 MAT 服务。参与者随访 12-24 个月。主要目的是评估未来随机对照试验的可行性。为了实现这一目标,我们观察了以下终点:标准护理组中注射伙伴的 HIV 发病率,以及 HIV 感染的 PWID 及其注射伙伴的入组和保留率,以及综合干预措施的接受程度。该研究还旨在评估综合干预措施的可行性、障碍和接受程度。在排除不合格参与者后,在修改后的意向治疗人群中评估了终点。该试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,NCT02935296,目前正在进行中,但不招募新参与者。
发现:2015 年 2 月 5 日至 2016 年 6 月 3 日期间,筛查了 3343 名潜在的索引参与者,其中 502 名(15%)符合条件并入选。有 1171 名注射伙伴被转介,其中 806 名(69%)符合条件并入选。索引参与者被随机分配到干预组(126 名,占 25%)和标准护理组(376 名,占 75%)。在第 52 周时,大多数存活的索引参与者(451 名中的 389 名,占 86%)和伙伴(710 名中的 567 名,占 80%)得到保留,并且与标准护理组相比,干预组的索引参与者报告的 ART 使用更高(概率比 [PR] 1.7,95%CI 1.4-1.9)。干预组的病毒抑制也高于标准护理组(PR 1.7,95%CI 1.3-2.2)。与标准护理组相比,干预组的索引参与者在第 52 周时报告的 MAT 使用更多(PR 1.7,95%CI 1.3-2.2)。发生了 7 例 HIV 感染事件,均发生在标准护理组的注射伙伴中(干预发病率为每 100 人年 0.0,95%CI 0.0-1.7;标准护理发病率为每 100 人年 1.0,95%CI 0.4-2.1;发病率差异为每 100 人年 1.0,95%CI 2.1-1.1)。没有记录到因干预而导致的严重不良事件。
解释:这项先锋研究提供了证据,表明灵活、可扩展的干预措施可以增加 PWID 的 ART 和 MAT 使用,并降低死亡率。两组的 HIV 发病率均较低,这阻碍了未来的随机对照试验,但鉴于干预措施效果的强度,应考虑在 HIV 感染的 PWID 中实施。
资金来源:美国国立卫生研究院。
Cell Rep Med. 2025-6-17
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024-12-5
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017-7-1