• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美罗培南/黏菌素与美罗培南/氨苄西林-舒巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎的比较

Meropenem/colistin versus meropenem/ampicillin-sulbactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant pneumonia.

作者信息

Khalili Hossein, Shojaei Lida, Mohammadi Mostafa, Beigmohammadi Mohammad-Taghi, Abdollahi Alireza, Doomanlou Mahsa

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

出版信息

J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Sep;7(9):901-911. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0037. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

DOI:10.2217/cer-2018-0037
PMID:30192166
Abstract

AIM

Efficacy of colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam have not been compared in treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to A. baumannii. Efficacy of colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam in combination with meropenem were compared in treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii.

METHOD

47 patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii were randomized to receive meropenem/colistin or meropenem/ampicillin-sulbactam for 14 days. Clinical and microbiological responses and 28-day mortality were considered as outcomes.

RESULTS

Clinical response (75 vs 69.6%; p = 0.75) and microbial eradication (87.50 vs 91.3%; p = 0.59) were comparable between meropenem/colistin and meropenem/ampicillin-sulbactam groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, clinical and microbiological response were comparable between the meropenem/colistin and meropenem/ampicillin-sulbactam groups.

摘要

目的

在治疗鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎方面,尚未对黏菌素和氨苄西林-舒巴坦的疗效进行比较。在治疗耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎方面,比较了黏菌素和氨苄西林-舒巴坦联合美罗培南的疗效。

方法

47例耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎患者被随机分为两组,分别接受美罗培南/黏菌素或美罗培南/氨苄西林-舒巴坦治疗14天。将临床和微生物学反应以及28天死亡率视为观察指标。

结果

美罗培南/黏菌素组和美罗培南/氨苄西林-舒巴坦组的临床反应(分别为75%对69.6%;p = 0.75)和微生物清除率(分别为87.50%对91.3%;p = 0.59)相当。

结论

在本研究中,美罗培南/黏菌素组和美罗培南/氨苄西林-舒巴坦组的临床和微生物学反应相当。

相似文献

1
Meropenem/colistin versus meropenem/ampicillin-sulbactam in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant pneumonia.美罗培南/黏菌素与美罗培南/氨苄西林-舒巴坦治疗碳青霉烯类耐药肺炎的比较
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Sep;7(9):901-911. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0037. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
2
Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Retrospective Comparison Between Intravenous Colistin and Intravenous Ampicillin-Sulbactam.耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌呼吸机相关性肺炎的治疗:静脉注射黏菌素与静脉注射氨苄西林-舒巴坦的回顾性比较
Am J Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;23(1):e78-85. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e3182a32df3.
3
Colistin alone or combined with sulbactam or carbapenem against A. baumannii in ventilator-associated pneumonia.单独使用黏菌素或联合舒巴坦或碳青霉烯类药物治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎中的鲍曼不动杆菌。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 May 18;9(5):476-85. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6195.
4
Efficacy and safety of high-dose ampicillin/sulbactam vs. colistin as monotherapy for the treatment of multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ventilator-associated pneumonia.大剂量氨苄西林/舒巴坦与多粘菌素单药治疗多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效及安全性比较
J Infect. 2008 Jun;56(6):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2008.04.002. Epub 2008 May 23.
5
[Efficacy of extended-infusion of carbapenem plus sulbactam for ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extensive drug-resistant ].碳青霉烯类联合舒巴坦延长输注治疗广泛耐药菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎的疗效
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Oct 17;97(38):2996-3000. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.38.010.
6
Successful treatment of skin and soft tissue infection due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii by ampicillin-sulbactam and meropenem combination therapy.美罗培南与氨苄西林-舒巴坦联合治疗碳青霉烯类耐药鲍曼不动杆菌所致皮肤软组织感染一例
Int J Infect Dis. 2013 Dec;17(12):e1234-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
7
Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: beyond carbapenem resistance.耐黏菌素鲍曼不动杆菌:超越碳青霉烯类耐药性
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1295-303. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ048. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
8
A prospective evaluation of synergistic effect of sulbactam and tazobactam combination with meropenem or colistin against multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.舒巴坦和他唑巴坦与美罗培南或黏菌素联合使用对多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌协同作用的前瞻性评估。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2015 Oct 14;15(4):24-9. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2015.526.
9
Management of ventilator associated pneumonia with a new antibiotic adjuvant entity (ceftriaxone+sulbactam+disodium edetate) - A novel approach to spare carbapenems.使用新型抗生素辅助制剂(头孢曲松+舒巴坦+依地酸二钠)治疗呼吸机相关性肺炎——一种避免使用碳青霉烯类药物的新方法。
J Crit Care. 2017 Oct;41:145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 15.
10
Colistin-based treatment for extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii pneumonia.多黏菌素联合治疗广泛耐药鲍曼不动杆菌肺炎。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2014 Apr;43(4):378-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.016. Epub 2014 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Efficacy of Adding Inhaled Levofloxacin and Colistin to a Basic Regimen of Colistin and Meropenem in the Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria: A Randomized Open-label Clinical Trial.在多药耐药革兰氏阴性菌所致呼吸机相关性肺炎治疗中,吸入用左氧氟沙星和黏菌素添加至黏菌素和美罗培南基础方案的疗效比较:一项随机开放标签临床试验
J Res Pharm Pract. 2025 Jun 13;14(1):9-17. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_12_25. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
2
The Effectiveness of Colistin/Rifampin Compared to Colistin/Meropenem in the Treatment of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Caused by Carbapenem-resistant : A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.与黏菌素/美罗培南相比,黏菌素/利福平治疗耐碳青霉烯类引起的呼吸机相关性肺炎的有效性:一项随机对照临床试验
J Res Pharm Pract. 2025 Mar 11;13(3):65-71. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_51_24. eCollection 2024 Jul-Sep.
3
Sulbactam for carbapenem-resistant infections: a literature review.舒巴坦用于耐碳青霉烯类感染:一项文献综述。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Apr 12;7(2):dlaf055. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlaf055. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
The Mortality of Colistin Monotherapy Colistin-Sulbactam for Carbapenem-Resistant Pneumonia: A Propensity Score Analysis.多黏菌素单药治疗与多黏菌素-舒巴坦治疗耐碳青霉烯类肺炎的死亡率:一项倾向评分分析
Infect Chemother. 2025 Mar;57(1):138-147. doi: 10.3947/ic.2024.0125.
5
Fighting resistance with redundancy: a path forward for treating antimicrobial-resistant infections?以冗余对抗耐药性:治疗抗微生物药物耐药感染的前进之路?
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;69(4):e0012125. doi: 10.1128/aac.00121-25. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
6
Innovative Antibiotic Therapies for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections: Clinical Efficacy, Safety, and Comparative Studies.用于耐碳青霉烯类革兰氏阴性菌感染的创新抗生素疗法:临床疗效、安全性及比较研究
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 29;13(2):295. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020295.
7
Carbapenem-resistant and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia; Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Current Therapeutic Approaches.耐碳青霉烯类与呼吸机相关性肺炎:流行病学、危险因素及当前治疗方法
J Res Pharm Pract. 2024 Dec 23;13(2):33-40. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_24. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of colistin plus meropenem therapy for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.多黏菌素联合美罗培南治疗医院获得性肺炎的系统评价与Meta分析
Iran J Microbiol. 2024 Dec;16(6):722-731. doi: 10.18502/ijm.v16i6.17244.
9
Geographical mapping and temporal trends of Acinetobacter baumannii carbapenem resistance: A comprehensive meta-analysis.鲍曼不动杆菌对碳青霉烯类耐药的地理分布及时间趋势:一项综合荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 16;19(12):e0311124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311124. eCollection 2024.
10
Treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant .治疗耐碳青霉烯类抗生素的感染。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024 Jul 18;14:1395260. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1395260. eCollection 2024.