Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1342-1349. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3205.
Over the past 2 decades, a variety of new care options have emerged for acute care, including urgent care centers, retail clinics, and telemedicine. Trends in the utilization of these newer care venues and the emergency department (ED) have not been characterized.
To describe trends in visits to different acute care venues, including urgent care centers, retail clinics, telemedicine, and EDs, with a focus on visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used deidentified health plan claims data from Aetna, a large, national, commercial health plan, from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2015, with approximately 20 million insured members per study year. Descriptive analysis was performed for health plan members younger than 65 years. Data analysis was performed from December 28, 2016, to February 20, 2018.
Utilization, inflation-adjusted price, and spending associated with visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions. Low-acuity conditions were identified using diagnosis codes and included acute respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, rashes, and musculoskeletal strains.
This study included 20.6 million acute care visits for treatment of low-acuity conditions over the 8-year period. Visits to the ED for the treatment of low-acuity conditions decreased by 36% (from 89 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 57 visits per 1000 members in 2015), whereas use of non-ED venues increased by 140% (from 54 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 131 visits per 1000 members in 2015). There was an increase in visits to all non-ED venues: urgent care centers (119% increase, from 47 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 103 visits per 1000 members in 2015), retail clinics (214% increase, from 7 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 22 visits per 1000 members in 2015), and telemedicine (from 0 visits in 2008 to 6 visits per 1000 members in 2015). Utilization and spending per person per year for low-acuity conditions had net increases of 31% (from 143 visits per 1000 members in 2008 to 188 visits per 1000 members in 2015) and 14% ($70 per member in 2008 to $80 per member in 2015), respectively. The increase in spending was primarily driven by a 79% increase in price per ED visit for treatment of low-acuity conditions (from $914 per visit in 2008 to $1637 per visit in 2015).
From 2008 to 2015, total acute care utilization for the treatment of low-acuity conditions and associated spending per member increased, and utilization of non-ED acute care venues increased rapidly. These findings suggest that patients are more likely to visit urgent care centers than EDs for the treatment of low-acuity conditions.
在过去的 20 年中,出现了各种新的急性护理选择,包括紧急护理中心、零售诊所和远程医疗。这些较新的护理场所和急诊部(ED)的使用趋势尚未得到描述。
描述不同急性护理场所(包括紧急护理中心、零售诊所、远程医疗和 ED)的就诊趋势,重点是治疗低严重程度疾病的就诊情况。
设计、地点和参与者:本队列研究使用了 Aetna 的匿名健康计划索赔数据,Aetna 是一家大型全国性商业健康计划,每个研究年度约有 2000 万参保成员。对 65 岁以下的健康计划成员进行描述性分析。数据分析于 2016 年 12 月 28 日至 2018 年 2 月 20 日进行。
用于治疗低严重程度疾病的就诊的使用情况、通货膨胀调整后的价格和支出。使用诊断代码识别低严重程度疾病,包括急性呼吸道感染、尿路感染、皮疹和肌肉骨骼拉伤。
在 8 年期间,这项研究共包括 2060 万例用于治疗低严重程度疾病的急性护理就诊。ED 治疗低严重程度疾病的就诊量下降了 36%(从 2008 年每 1000 名成员 89 次就诊下降到 2015 年每 1000 名成员 57 次就诊),而非 ED 场所的使用率增加了 140%(从 2008 年每 1000 名成员 54 次就诊增加到 2015 年每 1000 名成员 131 次就诊)。所有非 ED 场所的就诊量都有所增加:紧急护理中心(增加 119%,从 2008 年每 1000 名成员 47 次就诊增加到 2015 年每 1000 名成员 103 次就诊)、零售诊所(增加 214%,从 2008 年每 1000 名成员 7 次就诊增加到 2015 年每 1000 名成员 22 次就诊)和远程医疗(从 2008 年的 0 次就诊增加到 2015 年的每 1000 名成员 6 次就诊)。低严重程度疾病的人均就诊量和每年人均支出分别增加了 31%(从 2008 年每 1000 名成员 143 次就诊增加到 2015 年每 1000 名成员 188 次就诊)和 14%(从 2008 年每名成员 70 美元增加到 2015 年每名成员 80 美元)。支出的增加主要是由于 ED 治疗低严重程度疾病的每次就诊价格增加了 79%(从 2008 年每次就诊 914 美元增加到 2015 年每次就诊 1637 美元)。
从 2008 年到 2015 年,用于治疗低严重程度疾病的总急性护理使用量和每位成员的相关支出增加,非 ED 急性护理场所的使用率迅速增加。这些发现表明,患者更有可能因低严重程度疾病前往紧急护理中心而非 ED 就诊。