Suppr超能文献

验证和改进小儿经导管介入治疗风险评分(CRISP 评分):先天性心脏病介入研究联盟的分析。

Validation and refinement of the catheterization RISk score for pediatrics (CRISP score): An analysis from the congenital cardiac interventional study consortium.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Jan 1;93(1):97-104. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27837. Epub 2018 Sep 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To externally validate the CRISP score, and determine if refinements might improve clinical utility.

BACKGROUND

The CRISP score estimates risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) for pediatric catheterization.

METHODS

Pediatric (age < 18) procedures reported to the Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium registry from 05/08 to 09/17 (n = 29,830, 27 centers) were divided into a development dataset of 14,784 earlier procedures, and a validation dataset of 15,046 more recent procedures. The development dataset was used to refit the original CRISP model, and to develop a revised(r) CRISP score, consisting of entirely pre-procedurally collected data. The validation dataset was then used to compare model fit and risk prediction between CRISP, rCRISP and two existing risk scores using Akaike's (AIC), Schwarz's (BIC) Bayes Information Criteria, -log Likelihood (N2LL), area under the receiver operator curve and chi-square goodness-of-fit statistic (across 5 risk categories).

RESULTS

Overall 4.31% of patients experienced at least one SAE with frequency increasing from 1.08% in CRISP category 1 to 27.34% in category 5. Both CRISP and rCRISP (entirely pre-procedural) predicted risk of SAEs well, with observed to predicted ratios ranging from 0.71 to 1.18 across the 5 risk categories. Compared to the original CRISP score, rCRISP demonstrated less optimal model fit (higher AIC, BIC, and N2LL) but similar risk prediction (C-statistic = 0.71 vs. 0.70; chi-squared statistic = 6.77 vs. 6.85).

CONCLUSION

The CRISP score accurately predicts procedural risk. With minor modifications, the revised version (rCRISP) performed well with arguably greater clinical utility as an entirely preprocedural risk model.

摘要

目的

对 CRISP 评分进行外部验证,并确定是否可以通过改进来提高临床实用性。

背景

CRISP 评分用于估计小儿导管术严重不良事件(SAE)的风险。

方法

从 2008 年 5 月至 2017 年 9 月,向先天性心血管介入研究联盟登记处报告的小儿(年龄<18 岁)程序(n=29830,27 个中心)被分为开发数据集(14784 例早期程序)和验证数据集(15046 例近期程序)。开发数据集用于重新拟合原始 CRISP 模型,并开发一个新的 CRISP 评分(rCRISP),该评分由完全在术前收集的数据组成。然后,使用验证数据集比较 CRISP、rCRISP 和两个现有风险评分之间的模型拟合度和风险预测,使用赤池信息量准则(AIC)、施瓦茨贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)、-对数似然(N2LL)、接收者操作特征曲线下面积和卡方拟合优度统计量(在 5 个风险类别中)。

结果

总体而言,4.31%的患者至少发生了一次 SAE,频率从 CRISP 类别 1 的 1.08%增加到类别 5 的 27.34%。CRISP 和 rCRISP(完全术前)都很好地预测了 SAE 的风险,观察到的与预测的比值在 5 个风险类别中从 0.71 到 1.18 不等。与原始 CRISP 评分相比,rCRISP 表现出较差的模型拟合度(更高的 AIC、BIC 和 N2LL),但风险预测相似(C 统计量=0.71 与 0.70;卡方统计量=6.77 与 6.85)。

结论

CRISP 评分准确预测手术风险。经过轻微修改,修订后的版本(rCRISP)表现良好,作为一种完全术前风险模型,具有更大的临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验