Ko Hak Cheol, Ryu Chang-Woo, Yun Seong Jong, Koh Jun Seok, Shin Hee Sup, Kim Eui Jong
Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
Neurointervention. 2018 Sep;13(2):90-99. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2018.01039. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
Characteristic signs - the susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) and the prominent hypointense vessel sign (PHVS) - on T2*-based magnetic resonance imaging (T2*MRI) can be seen for acute ischemic stroke with large artery occlusion. In this study, we investigated the evidence to support our hypothesis that these findings may help to predict outcomes after reperfusion therapy.
We searched for papers describing SVS and PHVS in patients treated with reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke, and their functional/radiologic outcomes were systematically reviewed.
Nine studies on the SVS and six studies on the PHVS were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of recanalization after intravenous thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy was not significantly different with the presence of SVS (OR, 0.615; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.335-1.131 and OR, 0.993; 95% CI, 0.629-1.567). The OR of favorable functional outcome after reperfusion therapy in terms of the presence of PHVS varied (0.083 to 1.831) by study.
Our meta-analysis of the published data showed that a SVS was not a predictive factor for recanalization after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Currently, the data available on T2MRI are too limited to warrant reperfusion therapy in routine practice. More data are needed from studies with randomized treatment allocation to determine the role of T2MRI.
在基于T2的磁共振成像(T2MRI)上,急性大动脉闭塞性缺血性卒中可见特征性征象——易损血管征(SVS)和显著低信号血管征(PHVS)。在本研究中,我们调查了支持我们假设的证据,即这些发现可能有助于预测再灌注治疗后的预后。
我们检索了描述急性缺血性卒中再灌注治疗患者的SVS和PHVS的论文,并对其功能/放射学结果进行了系统评价。
纳入了9项关于SVS的研究和6项关于PHVS的研究。静脉溶栓或机械取栓后再通的合并比值比(OR)在存在SVS时无显著差异(OR,0.615;95%置信区间[CI],0.335 - 1.131和OR,0.993;95%CI,0.629 - 1.567)。根据PHVS的存在情况,再灌注治疗后良好功能预后的OR因研究而异(0.083至1.831)。
我们对已发表数据的荟萃分析表明,SVS不是急性缺血性卒中再灌注治疗后再通的预测因素。目前,T2MRI可用数据过于有限,无法在常规实践中保证进行再灌注治疗。需要更多来自随机治疗分配研究的数据来确定T2MRI的作用。