Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2019 Dec;39(12):2368-2378. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18798762. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
Phase-contrast mapping (PCM) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides easy-access non-invasive quantification of global cerebral blood flow (gCBF) but its accuracy in altered perfusion states is not established. We aimed to compare paired PCM MRI and O-HO positron emission tomography (PET) measurements of gCBF in different perfusion states in a single scanning session. Duplicate combined gCBF PCM-MRI and O-HO PET measurements were performed in the resting condition, during hyperventilation and after acetazolamide administration (post-ACZ) using a 3T hybrid PET/MR system. A total of 62 paired gCBF measurements were acquired in 14 healthy young male volunteers. Average gCBF in resting state measured by PCM-MRI and O-HO PET were 58.5 ± 10.7 and 38.6 ± 5.7 mL/100 g/min, respectively, during hyperventilation 33 ± 8.6 and 24.7 ± 5.8 mL/100 g/min, respectively, and post-ACZ 89.6 ± 27.1 and 57.3 ± 9.6 mL/100 g/min, respectively. On average, gCBF measured by PCM-MRI was 49% higher compared to O-HO PET. A strong correlation between the two methods across all states was observed (R = 0.72, < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis suggested a perfusion dependent relative bias resulting in higher relative difference at higher CBF values. In conclusion, measurements of gCBF by PCM-MRI in healthy volunteers show a strong correlation with O-HO PET, but are associated with a large and non-linear perfusion-dependent difference.
相位对比映射(PCM)磁共振成像(MRI)提供了易于获取的无创性全脑血流(gCBF)定量方法,但在灌注状态改变时的准确性尚未确定。我们旨在比较单次扫描过程中 PCM MRI 和 O-HO 正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在不同灌注状态下对 gCBF 的配对测量。使用 3T 混合 PET/MR 系统,在静息状态、过度通气期间和乙酰唑胺给药后(post-ACZ)重复进行 gCBF 的 PCM-MRI 和 O-HO PET 联合测量。共在 14 名健康年轻男性志愿者中获得了 62 对 gCBF 测量值。在静息状态下,PCM-MRI 和 O-HO PET 测量的平均 gCBF 分别为 58.5±10.7 和 38.6±5.7 mL/100 g/min,过度通气时分别为 33±8.6 和 24.7±5.8 mL/100 g/min,post-ACZ 时分别为 89.6±27.1 和 57.3±9.6 mL/100 g/min。平均而言,PCM-MRI 测量的 gCBF 比 O-HO PET 高 49%。两种方法在所有状态下均显示出很强的相关性(R=0.72,P<0.001)。Bland-Altman 分析表明,存在依赖于灌注的相对偏差,导致在较高 CBF 值时出现更高的相对差异。总之,健康志愿者中 PCM-MRI 测量的 gCBF 与 O-HO PET 具有很强的相关性,但与较大的、依赖于灌注的非线性差异相关。