REACH: The Centre for Research in Ageing and Cognitive Health, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.
Present address: Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, David Goldberg Centre, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
BMC Med. 2018 Sep 11;16(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1135-2.
The heterogeneity of symptoms across dementia subtypes has important implications for clinical practice and dementia research. Variation in subtypes and associated symptoms may influence the capability to live well for people with dementia and carers. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential impact of dementia subtypes on the capability to live well for both people with dementia and their carers.
The analysis was based on the 1283 dyads of community-dwelling people with dementia and carers in the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) project, a large cohort study in Great Britain. Capability to live well was defined using three measures: quality of life, life satisfaction and wellbeing. Structural equation modelling was used to investigate capability to live well in seven dementia subtypes: Alzheimer's disease (AD), Vascular dementia (VaD), mixed AD/VaD, frontotemporal dementia (FTD), Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD), Lewy body dementia (LBD) and unspecified/other, accounting for dyadic data structure and adjusting for age and sex, type of relationship between person with dementia and their carer and the number of chronic conditions.
The major subtypes in this study population were AD (56%), VaD (11%) and mixed AD/VaD (21%). Compared to participants with AD, people with non-AD subtypes generally reported a lower capability to live well. Carers for people with PDD (- 1.71; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 3.24, - 0.18) and LBD (- 2.29; 95% CI - 3.84, - 0.75) also reported a lower capability to live well than carers for people with AD. After adjusting for demographic factors and comorbidity, PDD (- 4.28; 95% CI - 5.65, - 2.91) and LBD (- 3.76; 95% CI - 5.14, - 2.39) continued to have the strongest impact on both people with dementia and their carers.
This study suggests a variation in capability to live well across dementia subtypes. It is important for care providers to consider different needs across subtypes. Health professionals who provide post-diagnostic support may need to pay more attention to the complex needs of people living with PDD and LBD and their carers.
痴呆亚型之间症状的异质性对临床实践和痴呆研究具有重要意义。亚型和相关症状的变化可能会影响痴呆患者及其照顾者的生活质量。本研究旨在探讨痴呆亚型对痴呆患者及其照顾者生活质量的潜在影响。
该分析基于在英国开展的一项大型队列研究——改善痴呆体验和提高积极生活(IDEAL)项目中的 1283 对居住在社区的痴呆患者及其照顾者。使用三种措施来定义生活质量:生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感。采用结构方程模型来研究七种痴呆亚型(阿尔茨海默病(AD)、血管性痴呆(VaD)、AD 混合 VaD、额颞叶痴呆(FTD)、帕金森病痴呆(PDD)、路易体痴呆(LBD)和未指定/其他)对生活质量的影响,同时考虑到数据的对偶结构,并调整了痴呆患者与其照顾者之间的关系类型以及慢性疾病的数量。
在本研究人群中,主要亚型为 AD(56%)、VaD(11%)和 AD 混合 VaD(21%)。与 AD 患者相比,非 AD 亚型患者的生活质量普遍较低。与 AD 患者相比,PDD(-1.71;95%置信区间[CI] -3.24,-0.18)和 LBD(-2.29;95% CI -3.84,-0.75)患者的照顾者生活质量也较低。在调整人口统计学因素和合并症后,PDD(-4.28;95% CI -5.65,-2.91)和 LBD(-3.76;95% CI -5.14,-2.39)对痴呆患者及其照顾者的影响仍然最强。
本研究表明,不同的痴呆亚型之间存在生活质量的差异。护理提供者应考虑到不同亚型的不同需求。为患者提供诊断后支持的卫生专业人员可能需要更加关注 PDD 和 LBD 患者及其照顾者的复杂需求。