Lee Ming-Sum, Duan Lewei, Clare Ryan, Hekimian Avetis, Spencer Hillard, Chen Wansu
Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 1;122(3):405-412. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 May 2.
Randomized trials showed no survival benefit with statin therapy in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Whether these results are generalizable to HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or with mid-range ejection fraction is unclear. In a cohort of 13,440 patients with HF, 9,903 (73.7%) were treated with statins. The association between statin use and all-cause mortality was assessed with Cox proportional hazard regression models and survival time inverse probability weighting propensity scores analyses. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were applied to estimate the rate ratios (RR) for hospitalization. The association between statin treatment and clinical outcomes differed by ejection fraction group. In patients with HFpEF, statin use was associated with reduced mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66 to 0.81, p <0.001; average treatment effect [ATE] 0.48, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.84, p = 0.007) and reduced all-cause hospitalization (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.89, p <0.001). In contrast, in patients with HFrEF, no significant association was observed between statin use and mortality (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.0, p = 0.054; ATE 0.41, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.93, p = 0.11) or hospitalization (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.04, p = 0.17). Similarly, in patients with mid-range ejection fraction, there was no significant association with reduced mortality (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.95, p = 0.02, ATE 0.3, 95% CI -0.84 to 1.43, p = 0.61) or hospitalization (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.27, p = 0.44). In conclusion, statin use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF but not in patients with HFrEF or mid-range ejection fraction.
随机试验表明,他汀类药物治疗对射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者并无生存获益。这些结果是否适用于射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者或射血分数处于中等范围的患者尚不清楚。在一个包含13440例心力衰竭患者的队列中,9903例(73.7%)接受了他汀类药物治疗。使用Cox比例风险回归模型和生存时间逆概率加权倾向评分分析评估他汀类药物使用与全因死亡率之间的关联。应用具有稳健误差方差的多变量泊松回归模型来估计住院率比(RR)。他汀类药物治疗与临床结局之间的关联因射血分数组而异。在HFpEF患者中,使用他汀类药物与死亡率降低相关(风险比[HR]0.73,95%置信区间[CI]0.66至0.81,p<0.001;平均治疗效果[ATE]0.48,95%CI0.13至0.84,p = 0.007)以及全因住院率降低(RR 0.82,95%CI 0.76至0.89,p<0.001)。相比之下,在HFrEF患者中,未观察到他汀类药物使用与死亡率(HR 0.86,95%CI 0.74至1.0,p = 0.054;ATE 0.41,95%CI -0.09至0.93,p = 0.11)或住院率(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.82至1.04,p = 0.17)之间存在显著关联。同样,在射血分数处于中等范围的患者中,也未观察到与死亡率降低(HR 0.76,95%CI 0.60至0.95,p = 0.02,ATE 0.3,95%CI -0.84至1.43,p = 0.61)或住院率(RR 1.0