Mueller H J
J Oral Rehabil. 1986 Jul;13(4):383-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb00672.x.
The particle-size distributions of investment powders and the pore-size distributions of set-fired investments were investigated by electrozone size analysis, and by mercury intrusion scanning porosimetry, respectively, for a number of different investments, representing all three types available, namely: the gypsum-, phosphate- and silicate-bonded. The pore volume (V), the pore surface area (S), and their first derivatives with respect to radius, r, dV/dr and dS/dr, were obtained with pressures up to 414 MPa corresponding to spherical pores of 0.0018 micron radius if the Washburn equation is to apply. Results distinguished pores with a range of different sizes. Besides the porosity due to the matrix binder, porosity was also attributable to the refractory components. This latter type of porosity occurred with pore radii below about 0.03 micron, whereas matrix porosity occurred above this pore size. Matrix porosity for the phosphate materials was smallest at about 0.03 to 0.5 micron in radius, followed by the gypsum materials at about 0.3 to 0.6 micron, and by the silicate materials at about 1 to 10 micron. The particle-size distribution of the investment powders may affect both types of porosities, whereas the setting chemistries of the particular investment types may affect matrix porosity, by the generation of gaseous by-products. No major distinctions in pore size and distributions occurred between air-set and hygroscopic-set materials. This study emphasizes that at present, knowledge of the total pore volume only is inadequate for characterizing porosity distribution and hence investment permeability.
通过电区粒度分析和压汞扫描孔隙率测定法,分别对多种不同的包埋材料(代表所有三种可用类型,即石膏粘结型、磷酸盐粘结型和硅酸盐粘结型)的包埋粉粒度分布和烧结后包埋材料的孔径分布进行了研究。如果要应用沃什伯恩方程,在高达414兆帕的压力下可获得孔隙体积(V)、孔隙表面积(S)及其关于半径r的一阶导数dV/dr和dS/dr,对应于半径为0.0018微米的球形孔隙。结果区分了不同尺寸范围的孔隙。除了由于基体粘结剂导致的孔隙率外,孔隙率还可归因于耐火成分。后一种类型的孔隙率出现在孔隙半径低于约0.03微米时,而基体孔隙率出现在该孔径以上。磷酸盐材料的基体孔隙率在半径约为0.03至0.5微米时最小,其次是石膏材料在约0.3至0.6微米时,硅酸盐材料在约1至10微米时。包埋粉的粒度分布可能会影响两种孔隙率,而特定包埋材料类型的凝固化学性质可能会通过气态副产物的产生影响基体孔隙率。空气凝固型和吸湿凝固型材料在孔径和分布上没有重大区别。这项研究强调,目前仅了解总孔隙体积不足以表征孔隙率分布,因此也不足以表征包埋材料的渗透性。