University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
The R. Adam Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Program of Trauma, Baltimore, Maryland.
West J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;19(5):877-883. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2018.7.37989. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
Pain is the most common complaint for an emergency department (ED) visit, but ED pain management is poor. Reasons for poor pain management include providers' concerns for drug-seeking behaviors and perceptions of patients' complaints. Patients who had objective findings of long bone fractures were more likely to receive pain medication than those who did not, despite pain complaints. We hypothesized that patients who were interhospital-transferred from an ED to an intensive care unit (ICU) for urgent surgical interventions would display objective pathology for pain and thus receive adequate pain management at ED departure.
This was a retrospective study at a single, quaternary referral, academic medical center. We included non-trauma adult ED patients who were interhospital-transferred and underwent operative interventions within 12 hours of ICU arrival between July 2013 and June 2014. Patients who had incomplete ED records, required invasive mechanical ventilation, or had no pain throughout their ED stay were excluded. Primary outcome was the percentage of patients at ED departure achieving adequate pain control of ≤ 50% of triage level. We performed multivariable logistic regression to assess association between demographic and clinical variables with inadequate pain control.
We included 112 patients from 39 different EDs who met inclusion criteria. Mean pain score at triage and ED departure was 8 (standard deviation 8 and 5 [3]), respectively. Median of total morphine equivalent unit (MEU) was 7.5 [5-13] and MEU/kg total body weight (TBW) was 0.09 [0.05-0.16] MEU/kg, with median number of pain medication administration of 2 [1-3] doses. Time interval from triage to first narcotic dose was 61 (35-177) minutes. Overall, only 38% of patients achieved adequate pain control. Among different variables, only total MEU/kg was associated with significant lower risk of inadequate pain control at ED departure (adjusted odds ratio = 0.22; 95% confidence interval = 0.05-0.92, p = 0.037).
Pain control among a group of interhospital-transferred patients requiring urgent operative interventions, was inadequate. Neither demographic nor clinical factors, except MEU/kg TBW, were shown to associate with poor pain management at ED departure. Emergency providers should consider more effective strategies, such as multimodal analgesia, to improve pain management in this group of patients.
疼痛是急诊科就诊最常见的主诉,但急诊科疼痛管理效果不佳。疼痛管理不佳的原因包括医务人员对觅药行为的担忧以及对患者主诉的看法。尽管有疼痛主诉,但有长骨骨折客观发现的患者比没有骨折客观发现的患者更有可能接受疼痛药物治疗。我们假设从急诊科转至重症监护病房(ICU)接受紧急外科干预的患者会因疼痛出现客观病理,因此在离开急诊科时会得到充分的疼痛管理。
这是一项单中心、四级转诊、学术医疗中心的回顾性研究。我们纳入了 2013 年 7 月至 2014 年 6 月期间在 ICU 到达后 12 小时内接受手术干预的非创伤性成年急诊科患者。排除了 ED 记录不完整、需要有创机械通气或整个 ED 期间无疼痛的患者。主要结局是离开急诊科时达到≤50%分诊级别疼痛控制的患者比例。我们进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估人口统计学和临床变量与疼痛控制不足之间的关联。
我们纳入了来自 39 个不同急诊科的 112 名符合纳入标准的患者。分诊时和离开急诊科时的疼痛评分均值分别为 8(标准差 8 和 5[3])。总吗啡等效单位(MEU)中位数为 7.5[5-13],MEU/kg 总体重(TBW)为 0.09[0.05-0.16]MEU/kg,疼痛药物管理中位数为 2[1-3]剂量。从分诊到首次使用麻醉性镇痛药的时间间隔为 61(35-177)分钟。总体而言,只有 38%的患者达到了充分的疼痛控制。在不同变量中,只有总 MEU/kg 与离开急诊科时疼痛控制不足的风险显著降低相关(调整后的优势比=0.22;95%置信区间=0.05-0.92,p=0.037)。
在一组需要紧急手术干预的院内转科患者中,疼痛控制不理想。除 MEU/kg TBW 外,没有发现人口统计学或临床因素与离开急诊科时疼痛管理不佳相关。急诊提供者应考虑采用更有效的策略,如多模式镇痛,以改善这群患者的疼痛管理。