Systematic re-evaluation of SCN5A variants associated with Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND

A large number of SCN5A variants have been reported to underlie Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, the evidence supporting individual variants is highly heterogeneous.

OBJECTIVE

We systematically re-evaluated all SCN5A variants reported in BrS using the 2015 American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines.

METHODS

A PubMed/Embase search was performed to identify all reported SCN5A variants in BrS. Standardized bioinformatic re-analysis (SIFT, PolyPhen, Mutation Taster, Mutation assessor, FATHMM, GERP, PhyloP, and SiPhy) and re-evaluation of frequency in the gnomAD database were performed. Fourteen ACMG-AMP rules were deemed applicable for SCN5A variant analysis.

RESULTS

Four hundred and eighty unique SCN5A variants were identified, the majority of which 425 (88%) were coding variants. One hundred and fifty-six of 425 (37%) variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic. Two hundred and fifty-eight (60%) were classified as variants of uncertain significance, while a further 11 (3%) were classified as benign/likely benign. When considering the subset of variants that were considered "null" variants separately, 95% fulfilled criteria for pathogenicity/likely pathogenicity. In contrast, only 17% of missense variants fulfilled criteria for pathogenicity/likely pathogenicity. Importantly, however, only 25% of missense variants had available functional data, which was a major score driver for pathogenic classification.

CONCLUSION

Based on contemporary ACMG-AMP guidelines, only a minority of SCN5A variants implicated in BrS fulfill the criteria for pathogenicity or likely pathogenicity.