Bonora Juan P, Frydman Judith, Retta Alejandra, Canepari Andrea
Hospital de Pediatría "Prof. Dr. Juan P. Garrahan".
Hospital Central de Pediatría de Malvinas Argentinas.
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2018 Oct 1;116(5):333-339. doi: 10.5546/aap.2018.eng.333.
Extubation failure is a complication that increases morbidity and mortality. Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has demonstrated to be effective as ventilatory support therapy.
To determine the rate of postextubation NIV success and the factors associated with procedural failure or success.
Design: observational, retrospective, analytical, and multicenter study. All patients who required post-extubation NIV during 2014 and 2015 were included. Rescue NIV was defined as the implementation of NIV for acute respiratory failure; elective NIV was described as its implementation for prophylaxis. NIV failure was defined as the need for orotracheal intubation within the first 48 hours. The characteristics of failure and success and the types of NIV were compared, and the equipment used was assessed.
Rescue NIV was required in 112 children; elective NIV, in 143. The rates of success were 68.8% and 72.7%, respectively. Mortality was higher among patients in whom rescue NIV failed compared to those with successful NIV. A longer length of stay and more days of invasive mechanical ventilation prior to extubation were observed in the elective NIV group. The most common diagnosis was acute lower respiratory tract infection in previously healthy children.
The use of post-extubation NIV may be a useful tool to prevent reintubation with invasive mechanical ventilation. Immunocompromised patients and those with neurological history had a higher rate of failure. Patients with failure tolerated less hours of NIV and had a longer length of stay in the pediatric intensive care unit.
拔管失败是一种会增加发病率和死亡率的并发症。无创通气(NIV)已被证明作为通气支持疗法是有效的。
确定拔管后无创通气成功的比率以及与操作失败或成功相关的因素。
设计:观察性、回顾性、分析性多中心研究。纳入2014年和2015年期间所有需要拔管后无创通气的患者。挽救性无创通气定义为对急性呼吸衰竭实施无创通气;选择性无创通气是指为预防目的而实施。无创通气失败定义为在最初48小时内需要进行气管插管。比较失败和成功的特征以及无创通气的类型,并评估所使用的设备。
112名儿童需要挽救性无创通气;143名需要选择性无创通气。成功率分别为68.8%和72.7%。与无创通气成功的患者相比,挽救性无创通气失败的患者死亡率更高。在选择性无创通气组中观察到拔管前住院时间更长且有创机械通气天数更多。最常见的诊断是既往健康儿童的急性下呼吸道感染。
拔管后使用无创通气可能是预防有创机械通气再次插管的有用工具。免疫功能低下患者和有神经系统病史的患者失败率更高。失败的患者耐受无创通气的时间更短,在儿科重症监护病房的住院时间更长。