Suppr超能文献

11C-胆碱正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)与传统成像技术在检测复发性前列腺癌中的比较

Comparison of 11C-choline Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) and Conventional Imaging for Detection of Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

作者信息

Kawanaka Yusuke, Kitajima Kazuhiro, Yamamoto Shingo, Nakanishi Yukako, Yamada Yusuke, Hashimoto Takahiko, Suzuki Toru, Go Shuken, Kanematsu Akihiro, Nojima Michio, Sofue Keitaro, Trsurusaki Masakatsu, Tamaki Yukihisa, Yoshida Rika, Yamakado Koichiro

机构信息

Radiology, Hyogo, Nishinomiya, JPN.

Radiology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2018 Jul 11;10(7):e2966. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2966.

Abstract

We aimed to compare C-choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with conventional imaging, including pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic computed tomography (CT), and bone scintigraphy, for prostate cancer restaging. Thirty patients (median prostate-specific antigen [PSA: 11.8 ng/mL]) with suspected recurrent prostate cancer following definitive treatment underwent C-choline PET/CT and conventional imaging, including pelvic MRI, contrast-enhanced chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT, and bone scintigraphy. The results were compared with regard to patient- and lesion-based diagnostic performance for local recurrence, and for lymph node and bony metastases using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and McNemar's test. Documented local recurrence and node and bony metastases were present in 11 (36.7%), 10 (33.3%), and 17 (56.7%) cases, respectively, of the enrolled patients. Patient-based sensitivity / specificity / accuracy / area under the ROC curve for C-choline-PET/CT for diagnosing local recurrence were 90.9% / 94.7% / 93.3% / 0.975 and for conventional imaging were 90.9% / 100% / 96.7% / 1.0. Those who underwent C-choline-PET/CT for node metastasis were 90.0% / 95.0% / 93.3% / 0.925 and for conventional imaging were 70.0% / 95.0% / 86.7% / 0.905. Those who underwent C-choline-PET/CT for bone metastasis were 94.1% / 92.3% / 93.3% / 0.991 and who underwent conventional imaging were 94.1% / 84.6% / 90.0% / 0.982. No significant differences were observed among them. The lesion-based detection rate of C-choline PET/CT for local recurrences and node and bone metastases as compared to conventional imaging was 92.9% (13/14) vs. 92.9% (13/14); 87.1% (27/31) vs. 54.8% (17/31); and 96.9% (219/226) vs. 90.3% (204/226) respectively, with significant differences noted for detection of node and bone lesions (p=0.0044 and p=0.00030, respectively). C-choline-PET/CT is more accurate in the detection of recurrent prostate cancer nodes and bony metastatic lesions compared to conventional imaging and has the advantage of restaging the disease in a single step.

摘要

我们旨在比较C-胆碱正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)与传统成像方法,包括盆腔磁共振成像(MRI)、胸部、腹部和盆腔增强计算机断层扫描(CT)以及骨闪烁显像,用于前列腺癌再分期。30例(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]中位数为11.8 ng/mL)确诊治疗后疑似复发性前列腺癌的患者接受了C-胆碱PET/CT和传统成像检查,包括盆腔MRI、胸部、腹部和盆腔增强CT以及骨闪烁显像。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析和McNemar检验,比较了基于患者和病变的局部复发、淋巴结和骨转移的诊断性能。在纳入的患者中,分别有11例(36.7%)、10例(33.3%)和17例(56.7%)记录有局部复发、淋巴结转移和骨转移。基于患者的C-胆碱PET/CT诊断局部复发的敏感性/特异性/准确性/ROC曲线下面积分别为90.9%/94.7%/93.3%/0.975,传统成像分别为90.9%/100%/96.7%/1.0。接受C-胆碱PET/CT检查的患者诊断淋巴结转移的敏感性/特异性/准确性/ROC曲线下面积分别为90.0%/95.0%/93.3%/0.925,传统成像分别为70.0%/95.0%/86.7%/0.905。接受C-胆碱PET/CT检查的患者诊断骨转移的敏感性/特异性/准确性/ROC曲线下面积分别为94.1%/92.3%/93.3%/0.991,接受传统成像检查的患者分别为94.1%/84.6%/90.0%/0.982。它们之间未观察到显著差异。与传统成像相比,C-胆碱PET/CT对局部复发、淋巴结和骨转移的基于病变的检测率分别为92.9%(13/14)对92.9%(13/14);87.1%(27/31)对54.8%(17/31);96.9%(219/226)对90.3%(204/226),在检测淋巴结和骨病变方面存在显著差异(分别为p=0.0044和p=0.00030)。与传统成像相比,C-胆碱PET/CT在检测复发性前列腺癌淋巴结和骨转移病变方面更准确,并且具有一步完成疾病再分期的优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df77/6135306/1d8993f68852/cureus-0010-00000002966-i01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验