Sofu Hakan, Camurcu Yalkin, Issin Ahmet, Ucpunar Hanifi, Ozcan Seckin, Duman Serda
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Bahcelievler Medicalpark Hospital, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erzincan University Faculty of Medicine, Başbağlar mahallesi, 24030, Erzincan, Turkey.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Feb;29(2):471-478. doi: 10.1007/s00590-018-2303-y. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular PRP and HA injections applied as the treatment of Outerbridge grade 2 chondral lesions in patellofemoral joint during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.
The clinical and radiographic data of 61 patients between 18 and 45 years of age were evaluated. The patients were separated into three groups. Hyaluronic acid injection was applied in 22 knees (Group 1), PRP injection was applied in 18 knees (Group 2), and 21 knees did not have any specific treatment except ACL reconstruction (Group 3). All patients were followed clinically at least for 12 months. Clinical examination of the operated knee, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity scale were the outcome measures. Routine X-ray and MRI were also performed for all patients at 12-month postoperative follow-up visit.
Although the mean VAS and Lysholm scores at 3-month follow-up were better in Group 1 and 2 than Group 3, the efficacy of intra-articular PRP on healing process regarding progression of the mean VAS and Lysholm scores through 6- and 12-month follow-ups was significantly better and longer than HA. No statistically significant differences were detected according to Tegner activity scale between the groups at 3 and 6 months; however, Group 2 had better activity level than both Group 1 (p < 0.001) and 3 (p < 0.001) at the end of 12 months after surgery.
Intra-articular PRP injection applied as the treatment of concomitant Outerbridge grade 2 chondral lesion in patellofemoral joint during ACL reconstruction revealed better and durable clinical outcomes via decreasing the potentially negative effects of chondral pathology on postoperative healing with respect to HA injection.
III-retrospective comparative study.
本研究旨在比较评估关节内注射富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)在关节镜下前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术中治疗髌股关节Outerbridge 2级软骨损伤的有效性。
评估61例年龄在18至45岁之间患者的临床和影像学数据。患者被分为三组。22例膝关节注射透明质酸(第1组),18例膝关节注射PRP(第2组),21例膝关节除ACL重建外未进行任何特殊治疗(第3组)。所有患者至少接受12个月的临床随访。对手术膝关节进行临床检查、视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Lysholm膝关节评分和Tegner活动量表评分作为观察指标。所有患者在术后12个月随访时还进行了常规X线和MRI检查。
虽然第1组和第2组在术后3个月随访时的平均VAS和Lysholm评分优于第3组,但关节内注射PRP在6个月和12个月随访中关于平均VAS和Lysholm评分进展的愈合过程疗效明显优于HA且持续时间更长。在术后3个月和6个月时,根据Tegner活动量表在组间未检测到统计学显著差异;然而,术后12个月时第2组的活动水平优于第1组(p < 0.001)和第3组(p < 0.001)。
在ACL重建术中,关节内注射PRP治疗髌股关节合并的Outerbridge 2级软骨损伤,相对于HA注射,通过减少软骨病变对术后愈合的潜在负面影响,显示出更好且持久的临床效果。
III级——回顾性比较研究。