Master of Science in Orofacial Pain and Oral Medicine Program, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Periodontology, Diagnostic Sciences & Dental Hygiene, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2018 Oct;85:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of dental interventions in preventing or reducing the incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy, compared to similar control groups receiving no intervention. Randomized controlled trials (RCT), case-controls and cohorts on cancer patients with primary outcome being the prevalence of MRONJ were included. Four electronic databases were searched (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) up to February 12, 2018. A total of 409 abstracts were assessed and one case-control, one RCT and four cohort studies with 2332 cancer patients met our inclusion criteria. Risk of bias analysis followed Cochrane's handbook. Risk of bias was unclear for the case-control study and high risk for the RCT and all cohort studies. Five studies utilized preventive measures consisting of an initial examination and performing all necessary dental treatment before patients initiated antiresorptive therapy; one study used specialized post-extraction protocols utilizing plasma-rich in growth factors (PRGF) on cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy. Though dental preventive measures decreased MRONJ incidence by 77.3% in six studies with 2332 cancer patients (95% CI = 47.4-90.2%; p = .001) compared to control groups, quality of the evidence was low due to high or unclear risk of bias and the observational nature of five of the included studies. In conclusion, high-quality long-term prospective large sample size studies are needed to confirm these results due to high risk of bias and heterogeneous interventions. No funding.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估牙科干预措施在预防或减少接受抗吸收治疗的癌症患者药物相关性颌骨坏死(MRONJ)发生率方面的有效性,与未接受干预的类似对照组相比。纳入了针对癌症患者的随机对照试验(RCT)、病例对照和队列研究,主要结局为 MRONJ 的患病率。检索了四个电子数据库(Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science),检索截至 2018 年 2 月 12 日。共评估了 409 篇摘要,有 1 项病例对照研究、1 项 RCT 和 4 项队列研究纳入了 2332 例癌症患者,符合我们的纳入标准。风险偏倚分析遵循 Cochrane 手册。病例对照研究的风险偏倚不明确,RCT 和所有队列研究的风险偏倚高。五项研究采用了预防措施,包括在患者开始抗吸收治疗之前进行初始检查和进行所有必要的牙科治疗;一项研究在接受抗吸收治疗的癌症患者中使用富含生长因子的富血小板血浆(PRGF)的专门拔牙后方案。尽管六组研究(共 2332 例癌症患者)中,牙科预防措施使 MRONJ 的发生率降低了 77.3%(95%CI=47.4-90.2%;p=0.001),但由于高风险或不明确的偏倚以及五项研究均为观察性研究,证据质量较低。结论:由于存在高偏倚风险和干预措施的异质性,需要开展高质量的长期前瞻性大样本量研究来证实这些结果。无资金来源。