Suppr超能文献

单部位腹腔镜经皮腹膜外缝合术与改良经脐两孔腹腔镜疝囊缝合术治疗小儿腹股沟疝:两种不同方法的疗效比较

Single-Site Laparoscopic Percutaneous Extraperitoneal Closure Versus Modified Transumbilical Two-Port Laparoscopic Suturing of the Hernia Sac for the Treatment of Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: Comparison of the Outcomes of Two Different Approaches.

作者信息

Wang Furan, Zhong Hongji, Shou Tiejun, Chen Yi, Zhao Junfeng

机构信息

1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, China.

2 Department of Pediatric Urology, Ningbo Women and Children's Hospital, Ningbo, China .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):103-108. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0405. Epub 2018 Sep 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure (SLPEC) and modified transumbilical two-port laparoscopic suturing (M-TTLS) of the hernia sac for the treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia (PIH) and determine whether one approach was superior to another.

METHODS

From January 2014 to June 2017, a total of 599 children had undergone SLPEC or M-TTLS in our department. SLPEC and M-TTLS were the most frequently performed single-site laparoscopic procedures for PIH in our department, which represented the extraperitoneal and intraperitoneal approaches, respectively. All patients were followed up at the out-patients' clinics and the medical records were reviewed with respect to all operative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 412 patients undergoing SLPEC and 187 patients undergoing M-TTLS, of which 358 hernias were on the right side, 172 on the left and 69 bilaterally. Two hundred and thirty-one unilateral hernias with contralateral patent processus vaginalis underwent contralateral repair at the same session. Mean operation time was 10.81 minutes in unilateral repair and 17.00 minutes in bilateral repairs, respectively. The perioperative complications included minor extraperitoneal hematoma in four (0.44%) patients, recurrence in one (0.11%), hydrocele in five (0.56%), and contralateral metachronous inguinal hernia in three (1.00%). No other complication developed in either group. There was no significant difference of complications between the two approaches except for the longer operation time in M-TTLS.

CONCLUSIONS

Both SLPEC and M-TTLS were the safe and effective methods for PIH. The complications were comparable for M-TTLS and SLPEC, but operation time was significantly longer in M-TTLS than in SLPEC.

摘要

目的

评估单孔腹腔镜经皮腹膜外疝囊闭合术(SLPEC)和改良经脐双孔腹腔镜缝合术(M-TTLS)治疗小儿腹股沟疝(PIH)的手术效果,并确定哪种方法更具优势。

方法

2014年1月至2017年6月,我科共有599例儿童接受了SLPEC或M-TTLS手术。SLPEC和M-TTLS是我科最常用的单孔腹腔镜治疗PIH的手术方法,分别代表腹膜外和腹膜内入路。所有患者均在门诊随访,并对所有手术结果的病历进行了回顾。

结果

412例患者接受了SLPEC手术,187例患者接受了M-TTLS手术,其中右侧疝358例,左侧疝172例,双侧疝69例。231例单侧疝合并对侧鞘状突未闭的患者在同一手术中进行了对侧修补。单侧修补的平均手术时间分别为10.81分钟,双侧修补为17.00分钟。围手术期并发症包括4例(0.44%)患者出现轻微腹膜外血肿,1例(0.11%)复发,5例(0.56%)出现鞘膜积液,3例(1.00%)出现对侧迟发性腹股沟疝。两组均未出现其他并发症。除M-TTLS手术时间较长外,两种方法的并发症无显著差异。

结论

SLPEC和M-TTLS都是治疗PIH的安全有效方法。M-TTLS和SLPEC的并发症相当,但M-TTLS的手术时间明显长于SLPEC。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验