Schexnayder Stuart, Arnaud Ethan, Schexnayder Lyndsey, Patel Vikas, Leonardi Claudia, Dasa Vinod
Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 1;41(6):e783-e788. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180912-02. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
Although it is common practice to assess alignment prior to total knee arthroplasty, preoperative knee alignment and its effect on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) postoperatively has not been well studied. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine if there are differences in PROs between patients with valgus deformities and patients with varus deformities. Further, this study assessed the baseline differences between these 2 groups preoperatively. Patients were placed into either the valgus or the varus group. Data collected included age, sex, race, height, weight, body mass index, knee alignment, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and 2 PRO measures. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 5 scheduled follow-up visits during the first year postoperatively. The authors found that a higher percentage of female patients had a valgus deformity (84.9%). The varus group tended to have a higher body mass index. Radiographs revealed differences in tibia and femur deformities. The overall deformity was less in patients with a valgus deformity than in patients with a varus deformity (mean, 6.6° [SD, 4.4°] vs 8.6° [SD, 4.8°], P=.010). Preoperative Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms were significantly worse in the valgus group (P=.033). After adjusting for the significant baseline differences, all patients reported improved PROs during the postoperative period (P<.0001). Preoperatively, patients with valgus deformities and patients with varus deformities do not appear to be mere opposites of one another. The groups differed by sex, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms, and tibia, fibula, and overall deformity. Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in PROs during and up to 1 year. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e783-e788.].
尽管在全膝关节置换术前评估对线情况是常规做法,但术前膝关节对线情况及其对术后患者报告结局(PROs)的影响尚未得到充分研究。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定外翻畸形患者和内翻畸形患者在PROs方面是否存在差异。此外,本研究评估了这两组患者术前的基线差异。患者被分为外翻组或内翻组。收集的数据包括年龄、性别、种族、身高、体重、体重指数、膝关节对线、凯尔格伦-劳伦斯分级以及两项PRO指标。在术前以及术后第一年的5次预定随访中评估患者报告的结局。作者发现,女性患者中外翻畸形的比例更高(84.9%)。内翻组的体重指数往往更高。X线片显示胫骨和股骨畸形存在差异。外翻畸形患者的总体畸形程度低于内翻畸形患者(平均6.6°[标准差4.4°]对8.6°[标准差4.8°],P = 0.010)。外翻组术前膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分症状明显更严重(P = 0.033)。在调整了显著的基线差异后,所有患者在术后期间的PROs均有改善(P < 0.0001)。术前,外翻畸形患者和内翻畸形患者似乎并非仅仅是彼此的对立面。两组在性别、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分症状以及胫骨、腓骨和总体畸形方面存在差异。术后,在1年及以内的时间里,PROs没有显著差异。[《骨科》。2018;41(6):e783 - e788。]