Bujar Magdalena, McAuslane Neil, Salek Sam, Walker Stuart
1 Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom.
2 Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacology & Postgraduate Medicine, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016 Jul;50(4):487-495. doi: 10.1177/2168479016628573.
The science of decision making is well established, although in reality it is a mixture of science and art. What is currently lacking is research into decision making in medicines research and development. The aims of this study were to determine the current decision-making practices and methodologies for measuring the quality of the decision making and the barriers and solutions for making quality decisions within pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies.
Two analogous questionnaires were developed for use in this study. Fourteen agencies and 25 companies were asked to complete the questionnaire, assessing their decision making for submitting or approving a new drug application.
The 68% and 71% response rate from companies and agencies, respectively, suggests interest in this topic, but the area is largely unexplored within the pharmaceutical environment. Moreover, all companies and 90% of the agencies believed that decision making at their organizations could be improved. Although both stakeholders have, to some extent, already implemented frameworks and various methodologies, these are often informal and unsystematic. Challenges remain and there is a need to change the organizational culture by increasing the awareness of the quality aspect in decision making.
The findings of this study support the need to further characterize and assess the practices and behaviors of individuals and organizations. Furthermore, the barriers, mainly relating to the influence of biases, should be addressed by developing the general principles of a formal quality decision framework and identifying quality decision-making practices in order to ensure that structured decisions are made throughout the life cycle of medicines.
决策科学已得到充分确立,尽管在现实中它是科学与艺术的结合。目前缺乏的是对药物研发决策的研究。本研究的目的是确定制药公司和监管机构当前的决策实践、衡量决策质量的方法以及做出高质量决策的障碍和解决方案。
为该研究开发了两份类似的问卷。向14个机构和25家公司发放问卷,评估它们在提交或批准新药申请时的决策情况。
公司和机构的回复率分别为68%和71%,这表明对该主题有兴趣,但在制药环境中该领域在很大程度上尚未得到充分探索。此外,所有公司和90%的机构都认为其组织内的决策可以改进。尽管两个利益相关方在一定程度上已经实施了框架和各种方法,但这些往往是非正式和不系统的。挑战依然存在,需要通过提高对决策质量方面的认识来改变组织文化。
本研究结果支持进一步描述和评估个人及组织的实践与行为的必要性。此外,主要与偏见影响相关的障碍应通过制定正式质量决策框架的一般原则和确定高质量决策实践来解决,以确保在药物的整个生命周期内都能做出结构化决策。