Døssing Kaj, Mechlenburg Inger, Hansen Lars Bolvig, Søballe Kjeld, Østergaard Helle
Orthopaedic Department (K.D.) and Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy (H.Ø.), Viborg Regional Hospital, Denmark.
Orthopaedic Department (I.M. and K.S.), Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (I.M.), and Radiological Department (B.H.), Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
JB JS Open Access. 2017 Aug 10;2(3):e0007. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.17.00007. eCollection 2017 Sep 28.
The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether ultrasonography can be used as a diagnostic tool to exclude extremity fractures in adults.
This prospective comparative study involved 91 patients (age, ≥18 years) who had been referred by general practitioners for a conventional radiographic examination of a suspected extremity fracture. No additional clinical examination was performed. Ultrasound examination was consistently carried out prior to conventional radiographic examination, which was regarded as the gold standard. At the end of the study, the positive scans were confirmed by a specialist who was highly skilled in ultrasonography.
The prevalence of fractures in the study population was 27%. Ultrasonography had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 94%, a positive predictive value of 85%, a negative predictive value of 97%, a positive likelihood ratio of 15.33, and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.085. There seemed to be no association between the anomalous results and patient age or the specific anatomical region of the fracture.
The present study indicates that ultrasonography, when performed and interpreted by experienced ultrasonographers, has high accuracy for the diagnosis of a suspected extremity fracture. No systematic differences were found between the results of radiography and ultrasonography, and ultrasonography showed a high sensitivity and specificity.
Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
本研究的目的是调查超声检查是否可作为排除成人四肢骨折的诊断工具。
这项前瞻性比较研究纳入了91例年龄≥18岁的患者,这些患者由全科医生转诊,因疑似四肢骨折接受传统X线检查。未进行额外的临床检查。在传统X线检查(被视为金标准)之前,始终先进行超声检查。在研究结束时,由一位超声检查技术高超的专家确认阳性扫描结果。
研究人群中骨折的患病率为27%。超声检查的灵敏度为92%,特异度为94%,阳性预测值为85%,阴性预测值为97%,阳性似然比为15.33,阴性似然比为0.085。异常结果与患者年龄或骨折的特定解剖区域之间似乎没有关联。
本研究表明,由经验丰富的超声检查人员进行并解读时,超声检查对疑似四肢骨折的诊断具有很高的准确性。X线检查和超声检查的结果之间未发现系统性差异,且超声检查显示出高灵敏度和特异度。
诊断性II级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅《作者须知》。