Antonijevic Zoran, Kimber Martin, Manner David, Burman Carl-Fredrik, Pinheiro José, Bergenheim Klas
1 Cytel Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
2 Tessella, Abingdon, UK.
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2013 May;47(3):363-374. doi: 10.1177/2168479013480501.
Recently, consideration was given to the impact of dose selection strategies in phase IIb on the overall success of drug development programs. A natural next step is to simultaneously optimize design aspects of both phase IIB and phase III. We used type 2 diabetes as an example, including realistic regulatory and commercial scenarios for this indication. The expected net present value (eNPV) has been selected as the primary outcome because it naturally accommodates optimization, providing an explicit trade-off between the probability of success (PoS) and time delays and trial costs. Our findings are that larger studies and/or implementation of an adaptive design over a fixed design in phase IIb provide more precise dose selection and reduce the bias of treatment effects and uncertainty in the estimated eNPV within the range of sample sizes that we examined. Developers also have to ensure that dose selection criteria are consistent with development strategy and objectives.
最近,人们考虑了IIb期剂量选择策略对药物研发项目总体成功的影响。自然而然的下一步是同时优化IIb期和III期的设计方面。我们以2型糖尿病为例,包括该适应症实际的监管和商业情况。预期净现值(eNPV)已被选为主要结果,因为它自然地适应优化,在成功概率(PoS)、时间延迟和试验成本之间提供了明确的权衡。我们的研究结果是,在我们研究的样本量范围内,更大规模的研究和/或在IIb期采用适应性设计而非固定设计,能提供更精确的剂量选择,并减少治疗效果的偏差以及估计的eNPV中的不确定性。研发人员还必须确保剂量选择标准与研发策略和目标一致。