de Figueiredo Darcilene Maria, Mercadante Maria Eugênia Zerlotti, Pires Aldrin Vieira, Branco Renata Helena, Ribeiro Enilson Geraldo, Dallago Gabriel Machado, Schorer Marianne, Rocha Pedro Ribeiro
Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri-JK Campus, Rodovia MGT 367-Km 583, 5000, Diamantina, MG, 39.100-000, Brazil.
Instituto de Zootecnia, Centro APTA Bovinos de Corte, Sertãozinho, SP, 14.160-900, Brazil.
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019 Feb;51(2):449-456. doi: 10.1007/s11250-018-1714-4. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
This study aimed to compare feed efficiency measures of Nellore beef cattle on different residual intake and gain (RIG) classes. We used data from 610 animals weighing on average 236.33 kg and average of 283 days of age from feedlot performance tests carried out between 2005 and 2012. Animals were grouped based on RIG into three different classes: high RIG (> mean + 0.5 standard deviation (SD), most efficient; n = 193), medium RIG (mean ± 0.5 SD; n = 235), and low RIG (< mean - 0.5 SD, least efficient; n = 182). Residual feed intake (RFI), residual gain (RG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), feed efficiency (FE), relative growth rate (RGR), and Kleiber ratio (KR) of animals in each RIG class were compared by Tukey test at 1% of probability. Phenotypic correlations between variables were evaluated as well. Animals on high RIG class showed lower dry matter intake (P < 0.01) and higher average daily gain (P < 0.01) than low RIG animals. Consequently, high RIG animals had lower FCR (P < 0.01) and higher FE (P < 0.01) than those animals in low RIG class. The most efficient animals based on RIG were also the most efficient animals based on RG and RFI. RIG was negatively correlated to dry matter intake (P < 0.01) and FCR (P < 0.01), and a positive correlation was found between RIG and FE (P < 0.01). Therefore, RIG appears to be a good parameter to select animals with reduced dry matter intake and high productive performance.
本研究旨在比较不同剩余采食量与增重(RIG)等级的内洛尔肉牛的饲料效率指标。我们使用了2005年至2012年期间进行的育肥性能测试中610头平均体重236.33千克、平均年龄283天的动物的数据。根据RIG将动物分为三个不同等级:高RIG(>均值+0.5标准差(SD),最有效率;n = 193)、中RIG(均值±0.5 SD;n = 235)和低RIG(<均值 - 0.5 SD,效率最低;n = 182)。通过Tukey检验在1%的概率水平下比较了每个RIG等级动物的剩余采食量(RFI)、剩余增重(RG)、饲料转化率(FCR)、饲料效率(FE)、相对生长率(RGR)和克莱伯比率(KR)。还评估了变量之间 的表型相关性。高RIG等级的动物比低RIG等级的动物表现出更低的干物质摄入量(P < 0.01)和更高的平均日增重(P < 0.01)。因此,高RIG等级的动物比低RIG等级的动物具有更低的FCR(P < 0.01)和更高的FE(P < 0.01)。基于RIG最有效率的动物也是基于RG和RFI最有效率的动物。RIG与干物质摄入量(P < 0.01)和FCR(P < 0.01)呈负相关,而RIG与FE呈正相关(P < 0.01)。因此,RIG似乎是选择干物质摄入量低且生产性能高的动物的一个良好参数。