Biogeochemistry Research Centre, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Plymouth University, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Oct 17;20(10):1361-1372. doi: 10.1039/c8em00262b.
UK implementation of the European Union Water Framework Directive (for the 2015-2021 cycle) Ecological Status (ES) classification for river phosphorus is based on the calculation of reference conditions for reactive phosphorus (RP) using river alkalinity measurements. Underpinning this approach is that the alkalinity is primarily from rock weathering and is free of anthropogenic influences. However, the potential contribution of anthropogenic alkalinity needs to be considered and, if possible, quantified. In the rural South West River Basin District of England, 38 river sites were examined with respect to river alkalinity loads in order to test this consideration. At river base flow when RP can cause enhanced algal growth, 9 sites (24%) had effluent alkalinity contributions amounting to 25-49% of the total riverine alkalinity load, while 11 (29%) of the sites received ≥50% of their alkalinity load from effluent. When flows increased above base flow to Q95 flow at these 11 sites, catchment diffuse run-off became the largest load of alkalinity at 9 of the sites, and that at the Q95 flows, combined effluent and diffuse alkalinity loads contributed 68-100% of the total alkalinity load. Anthropogenic alkalinity is likely to be present in diffuse run-off, but it is difficult to apportion alkalinity loads between natural and contaminant sources. It is likely that diffuse loads of alkalinity will dominate on the annual timescales used to assess WFD compliance, even at sites where ground water alkalinity dominates at base river flows. In principle, inclusion of anthropogenic alkalinity in the calculation of ES boundary concentrations for RP may lead to a relaxation of the standards. In practice this may not follow. It is likely that at the river sites used initially to develop the algorithms now used for P standard setting, anthropogenic alkalinity was present, to varying and unknown degrees, and that this alkalinity would have influenced the measured and reference RP and biological metrics on which the P standards are based. Apart from RP, alkalinity is also used to underpin water quality metrics for additional chemical and biological parameters, and for this reason, understanding the complex factors determining river alkalinity loads should be an important task for water quality regulators.
英国实施的欧盟水框架指令(2015-2021 年周期)规定,河流中磷的生态状况(ES)分类是基于利用河流碱度测量值计算活性磷(RP)的参考条件。这种方法的基础是,碱度主要来自岩石风化,不受人为影响。然而,需要考虑并尽可能量化人为碱度的潜在贡献。在英格兰西南部农村流域地区,为了检验这一考虑,对 38 个河流站点的河流碱度负荷进行了检查。在 RP 可能导致藻类过度生长的河流基流条件下,有 9 个站点(24%)的出水碱度贡献占河流总碱度负荷的 25-49%,而 11 个站点(29%)的碱度负荷有≥50%来自出水。当这些站点的流量增加到基流以上的 Q95 流量时,集水区漫流成为 9 个站点中最大的碱度负荷来源,而在 Q95 流量下,出水和漫流的综合碱度负荷占总碱度负荷的 68-100%。人为碱度可能存在于漫流中,但很难在自然和污染来源之间分配碱度负荷。在评估 WFD 合规性所使用的年时间尺度上,漫流的碱度负荷很可能占主导地位,即使在基流时地下水碱度占主导地位的河流站点也是如此。原则上,在计算 RP 的 ES 边界浓度时纳入人为碱度可能会导致标准放宽。但实际上可能并非如此。在最初用于开发目前用于设置 P 标准的算法的河流站点,人为碱度可能以不同程度存在,而且这种碱度会影响基于 P 标准的测量和参考 RP 以及生物指标。除了 RP,碱度还用于支持其他化学和生物参数的水质指标,因此,了解决定河流碱度负荷的复杂因素应该是水质监管机构的一项重要任务。