Suppr超能文献

EuroFlow QA 中的常见问题及经验教训。

Frequent issues and lessons learned from EuroFlow QA.

机构信息

CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

CLIP Cytometry, Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Immunol Methods. 2019 Dec;475:112520. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Sep 17.

Abstract

EuroFlow Quality Assessment was designed to provide a feedback on the quality of the standardization effort in executing the EuroFlow protocols for sample preparation and instrument setup. It was first beta-tested by the members of the EuroFlow consortium internally (2010-2013) and opened to the external participants from 2015 onwards. The goal of participation in the EuroFlow QA is to evaluate whether the technical quality of the data generated by the laboratory is comparable to the data of the EuroFlow members and thus if a non-EuroFlow member participant can use the EuroFlow reference sample database for his own patient evaluation. Also it assesses whether data are sufficiently standardized for automated population gating and alarm notification. By spring 2018, a total 87 laboratories from 32 countries on five continents have registered for the EuroFlow QA program. We evaluated 163 results of 2015-2016 QA rounds, where we noted clear improvement in the score of first-time participants (median score of 91% correct) when they participated second time or later (median score of 94% correct, p = 0,017), which was comparable to EuroFlow member scores (median score of 97% correct). Among frequent mistakes, we found non-adherence to the EuroFlow protocols (improper reagent used), improper gating and some compensation issues. In summary, we show that EuroFlow QA has a positive impact on improvement of standardized data quality of non-member laboratories adhering to the EuroFlow standard operating procedures and reagent panels.

摘要

EuroFlow 质量评估旨在为执行 EuroFlow 协议进行样本制备和仪器设置的标准化工作提供反馈。它首先由 EuroFlow 联盟成员内部进行了β测试(2010-2013 年),并从 2015 年开始向外部参与者开放。参与 EuroFlow QA 的目的是评估实验室产生的数据的技术质量是否与 EuroFlow 成员的数据相当,以及非 EuroFlow 成员参与者是否可以将 EuroFlow 参考样本数据库用于自己的患者评估。它还评估数据是否足够标准化,以实现自动群体门控和报警通知。截至 2018 年春季,来自五大洲 32 个国家的 87 个实验室已注册参加 EuroFlow QA 计划。我们评估了 2015-2016 年 QA 轮次的 163 个结果,注意到首次参与者的分数明显提高(首次正确的中位数分数为 91%),当他们第二次或以后再次参加时(中位数分数为 94%,p=0.017),与 EuroFlow 成员的分数相当(中位数分数为 97%)。在常见错误中,我们发现存在不遵守 EuroFlow 协议(使用不当的试剂)、不当门控和一些补偿问题。总之,我们表明 EuroFlow QA 对遵守 EuroFlow 标准操作程序和试剂板的非成员实验室标准化数据质量的提高具有积极影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验