手持式麸质检测设备评估。
Evaluation of a Handheld Gluten Detection Device.
机构信息
Food Allergy Research & Resource Program, Food Innovation Center, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 1901 North 21st Street, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588-6207, USA.
出版信息
J Food Prot. 2018 Oct;81(10):1723-1728. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-184.
A portable, handheld gluten detection device, the Nima sensor, is now available for consumers wishing to determine if gluten is present in food. By U.S. regulation, gluten-free foods should contain <20 ppm of gluten. Thirteen gluten-free foods (muffins, three different types of bread, three different types of pasta, puffed corn snack, ice cream, meatballs, vinegar and oil salad dressing, oatmeal, and dark chocolate) were prepared; each food was spiked on a weight to weight basis with gluten levels of 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 100 ppm before processing or preparation. Unprocessed and processed foods were tested with the handheld gluten sensor and by two gluten-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) on the basis of the R5 and G12 monoclonal antibodies, respectively. The portable gluten detection device detected gluten in all food types at the 30-ppm addition level, failing to detect gluten in only 5 (6.4%) of 78 subsamples. At the 20-ppm addition level, the portable gluten detection device failed to detect gluten in one type of pasta but detected gluten residues in 63 (87.5%) of 72 other subsamples. The device was able to detect gluten at the 10-ppm addition level in 9 of the 13 food matrices (41 of 54 subsamples, 75.9%) but not in the three types of pasta and the puffed corn snack. The gluten-sensing device did not perform reliably at the 5-ppm addition level in 11 of 13 food matrices (exceptions: ice cream and muffins). In contrast, the ELISA methods were highly reliable at gluten addition levels of ≥10 ppm in all food matrices. The portable gluten detection device yielded a low percentage of false-positive results (4 of 111, 3.6%) in these food matrices. Thus, this handheld portable gluten sensor performed reliably in the detection of gluten in foods having ≥20 ppm of added gluten with only 18 (5.9%) of 306 failures, if results of the one type of pasta are excluded. The device worked with greater reliability as the gluten levels in the foods increased.
一种便携式手持麸质检测设备,即 Nima 传感器,现可供希望确定食物中是否含有麸质的消费者使用。根据美国法规,无麸质食品应含有<20ppm 的麸质。准备了 13 种无麸质食品(松饼、三种不同类型的面包、三种不同类型的意大利面、膨化玉米小吃、冰淇淋、肉丸、醋和油沙拉酱、燕麦片和黑巧克力);每种食物均按重量添加水平添加了 0、5、10、20、30、40 和 100ppm 的麸质,然后再进行加工或准备。未加工和加工食品均使用手持式麸质传感器和两种基于 R5 和 G12 单克隆抗体的特定麸质酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)进行测试。便携式麸质检测设备在 30ppm 添加水平下可检测到所有类型的食物中的麸质,仅在 78 个亚样本中的 5 个(6.4%)中未能检测到麸质。在 20ppm 添加水平下,便携式麸质检测设备未能检测到一种意大利面中的麸质,但在 72 个其他亚样本中的 63 个(87.5%)中检测到了麸质残留。该设备能够在 13 种食物基质中的 9 种(54 个亚样本中的 41 个,75.9%)中在 10ppm 添加水平下检测到麸质,但在三种意大利面和膨化玉米小吃中无法检测到。在 13 种食物基质中的 11 种(冰淇淋和松饼除外)中,麸质感应装置在 5ppm 添加水平下的性能不可靠。相比之下,在所有食物基质中,ELISA 方法在添加麸质水平≥10ppm 时具有高度可靠性。在这些食物基质中,便携式麸质检测设备的假阳性结果率较低(111 个中为 4 个,3.6%)。因此,如果排除一种意大利面的结果,该手持式便携式麸质传感器在检测添加麸质≥20ppm 的食物中的麸质时表现可靠,仅出现 306 次故障中的 18 次(5.9%)。随着食物中麸质水平的增加,该设备的可靠性更高。