Ponzani Paola, Berra Cesare, Di Lelio Alessandra, Del Sindaco Paola, Di Loreto Chiara, Reggiani Francesco, Lucisano Giuseppe, Rossi Maria Chiara
SSD Endocrinologia, Diabetologia e Malattie Metaboliche ASL3 Genovese, Genoa, Italy.
Humanitas Research Institute, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Dec;9(6):2209-2218. doi: 10.1007/s13300-018-0511-4. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Real-world evidence on effectiveness and safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) in patients with diabetes is a priority. The aim of the study was to evaluate patterns of use and the long-term effectiveness and safety of IDeg in routine clinical practice.
This was an observational longitudinal study. A retrospective chart review of all patients with type 2 diabetes treated with IDeg was performed and temporal trends in clinical outcomes were assessed. All data was stratified by treatment modality: the switch group consisted of patients already treated with another basal insulin before initiating IDeg; the add-on group consisted of basal insulin-naïve patients.
Overall, 247 patients were analyzed (55 in the add-on group and 192 in the switch group), mean age 67.0 ± 10.9 years ,and diabetes duration 16.3 ± 8.9 years. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 9.7 (8.0-11.9) months. In the add-on group, improvements were found in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (- 1.68%; p < 0.0001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (- 64.7 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), post-prandial glucose (PPG) (- 81.1 mg/dl; p < 0.0001), and glycemic variability (i.e., standard deviation of blood glucose) (- 11.6 mg/dl; p = 0.04). Even in the switch group, improvements were found in HbA1c (- 0.57%; p < 0.0001), FBG (- 28.1 mg/dL; p < 0.0001), and PPG (- 22.6 mg/dl; p = 0.001). Body weight increase during the follow-up was not statistically significant vs. baseline in both groups. Benefits on overall, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemia were found in the switch group.
These real-world data documented that initiating IDeg or switching to IDeg from other basal insulins in type 2 diabetes was associated with significant improvement in metabolic control without significant weight gain; a decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia was observed when switching to IDeg from another basal insulin.
关于德谷胰岛素(IDeg)在糖尿病患者中的有效性和安全性的真实世界证据是当务之急。本研究的目的是评估IDeg在常规临床实践中的使用模式、长期有效性和安全性。
这是一项观察性纵向研究。对所有接受IDeg治疗的2型糖尿病患者进行回顾性病历审查,并评估临床结局的时间趋势。所有数据按治疗方式分层:转换组由在开始使用IDeg之前已接受另一种基础胰岛素治疗的患者组成;联合治疗组由未使用过基础胰岛素的患者组成。
总体上,共分析了247例患者(联合治疗组55例,转换组192例),平均年龄67.0±10.9岁,糖尿病病程16.3±8.9年。中位(四分位间距)随访时间为9.7(8.0 - 11.9)个月。在联合治疗组中,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)(-1.68%;p<0.0001)、空腹血糖(FBG)(-64.7mg/dL;p<0.0001)、餐后血糖(PPG)(-81.1mg/dl;p<0.0001)及血糖变异性(即血糖标准差)(-11.6mg/dl;p = 0.04)均有改善。即使在转换组中,HbA1c(-0.57%;p<0.0001)、FBG(-28.1mg/dL;p<0.0001)和PPG(-22.6mg/dl;p = 0.001)也有改善。两组随访期间体重增加与基线相比无统计学意义。转换组在总体、夜间及严重低血糖方面有获益。
这些真实世界数据表明,在2型糖尿病患者中起始使用IDeg或从其他基础胰岛素转换为IDeg与代谢控制显著改善相关,且无显著体重增加;从另一种基础胰岛素转换为IDeg时,低血糖风险降低。