Suppr超能文献

临床Ⅰ期胰腺癌的分期过低和多模态治疗的影响。

Understaging of clinical stage I pancreatic cancer and the impact of multimodality therapy.

机构信息

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX.

出版信息

Surgery. 2019 Feb;165(2):307-314. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although current guidelines recommend multimodal therapy for all patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, it is unclear the extent to which clinical stage I patients are accurately staged and how this may affect management.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study of 4,404 patients aged 18-79 years with clinical stage 1 (ie, T1N0 or T2N0) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with upfront resection in the National Cancer Database (2004-2014), understaging was ascertained by comparing pretreatment clinical stage with pathologic stage. The association between adjuvant treatment and overall risk of death among true stage I and understaged patients was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

Upstaging was identified in 72.6% of patients (62.8% T3/4, 53.9% N1) of whom 69.7% received adjuvant therapy compared with 47.0% with true stage I disease. Overall survival at 5 years among those with true stage I disease was significantly higher than those who had been clinically understaged (42.9% vs 16.6%; log-rank, p < 0.001). For true stage I patients, adjuvant therapy was not associated with risk of death (hazard ratio: 1.07, 95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.29). For understaged patients, adjuvant therapy significantly decreased risk of death (hazard ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval: 0.55-0.74).

CONCLUSION

The majority of clinical stage I pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients actually have higher-stage disease and benefit from multimodal therapy; however, one third of understaged patients do not receive any adjuvant treatment. Clinicians should discuss all potential treatment strategies with patients (in the context of the acknowledged risks and benefits), including the utilization of neoadjuvant approaches in those presenting with potentially resectable disease.

摘要

背景

尽管目前的指南建议对所有胰腺导管腺癌患者采用多模式治疗,但尚不清楚临床 I 期患者的分期准确性以及这可能如何影响治疗。

方法

本研究对 4404 例年龄在 18-79 岁之间的临床 I 期(即 T1N0 或 T2N0)胰腺导管腺癌患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者均在国家癌症数据库(2004-2014 年)中接受了手术治疗。通过比较术前临床分期和病理分期,确定分期不足。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析评估辅助治疗与真正 I 期和分期不足患者全因死亡风险之间的关联。

结果

72.6%(62.8% T3/4,53.9% N1)的患者存在分期上调,其中 69.7%接受了辅助治疗,而真正 I 期疾病患者为 47.0%。真正 I 期疾病患者的 5 年总生存率明显高于临床分期不足的患者(42.9%比 16.6%;对数秩检验,p<0.001)。对于真正的 I 期患者,辅助治疗与死亡风险无关(风险比:1.07,95%置信区间:0.89-1.29)。对于分期不足的患者,辅助治疗显著降低了死亡风险(风险比:0.64,95%置信区间:0.55-0.74)。

结论

大多数临床 I 期胰腺导管腺癌患者实际上存在更高分期的疾病,并受益于多模式治疗;然而,三分之一的分期不足的患者未接受任何辅助治疗。临床医生应与患者讨论所有潜在的治疗策略(在承认的风险和获益的背景下),包括在有潜在可切除性疾病的患者中应用新辅助治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验