School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Management Office for Health Data, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40447, Taiwan.
Eur J Intern Med. 2019 Feb;60:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2018.09.001. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
This investigation aimed at assessing the issue of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with acute critical illness.
The study came from Taiwan and used that nation's Longitudinal Health Insurance Database 2000. Using propensity score matching, multivariable adjustment and competing risk methods, the correlations between the new-onset AF and critical illness (septicemia/septic shock, acute myocardial infarction【AMI】, hemorrhagic stroke and ischemic stroke) were investigated.
This study consisted of 46470 patients in the critical illness cohort, 618998 persons in the general population cohort. Additionally, 37,060 critically ill patients were matched with 37060 control patients based on propensity score methods. Compared with general population cohort, patients with septicemia/septic shock were 3.12-fold more likely to develop AF (95% confidence interval 【CI】 = 2.88-3.39), followed by patients with ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio【aHR】 = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.80-2.14), patients with AMI (aHR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.32-2.00) and patients with hemorrhagic stroke (aHR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.13-1.88). In addition, after controlling for the confounding factors and the competing risk of death, the critical illness cohort still exhibited a significantly higher risk of AF than the general population cohort (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] = 2.66, 95% CI = 2.49-2.84).
Our study explored incident AF among patients with critical illness in their medical history. Patients with septicemia/septic shock were at the highest risk of developing new-onset AF among these critically ill patients.
本研究旨在评估与急性危重症相关的新发心房颤动(AF)问题。
本研究来自中国台湾地区,采用该国的 2000 年纵向健康保险数据库。通过倾向评分匹配、多变量调整和竞争风险方法,研究新发 AF 与危重病(败血症/感染性休克、急性心肌梗死【AMI】、出血性卒中和缺血性卒中等)之间的相关性。
本研究包括危重病队列中的 46470 例患者和普通人群队列中的 618998 例患者。此外,根据倾向评分方法,37060 例危重病患者与 37060 例对照患者相匹配。与普通人群队列相比,败血症/感染性休克患者发生 AF 的可能性高 3.12 倍(95%置信区间[CI] = 2.88-3.39),其次是缺血性卒中患者(校正后的危险比[aHR] = 1.96,95%CI = 1.80-2.14)、AMI 患者(aHR = 1.62,95%CI = 1.32-2.00)和出血性卒中患者(aHR = 1.46,95%CI = 1.13-1.88)。此外,在控制混杂因素和死亡的竞争风险后,危重病队列发生 AF 的风险仍显著高于普通人群队列(校正后的亚危险比[aSHR] = 2.66,95%CI = 2.49-2.84)。
本研究探讨了危重病患者的新发 AF 情况。在这些危重病患者中,败血症/感染性休克患者新发 AF 的风险最高。