Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Département de Psychologie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1384-1392. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
Many sexual difficulties encountered by couples in their day-to-day lives, although of insufficient intensity and persistence to warrant a clinical diagnosis of sexual disorder, are nevertheless frequent and a source of individual and relational distress.
The aim of this study was to assess the event-level associations between couples' everyday, subclinical sexual difficulties (specifically, low subjective sexual arousal, low physiological sexual arousal, and genito-pelvic pain), the range of sexual behaviors that these couples engage in, and their sexual satisfaction.
70 Newlywed participants (35 couples, average age = 25.6 years, SD = 3.2 years; average duration of relationship = 5.4 years, SD = 3.4 years) individually completed daily diaries about sexual difficulties, range of activities performed during sex, and sexual satisfaction over the course of 5 weeks. Analyses were guided by the actor-partner interdependence model.
The main outcome was sexual satisfaction, measured at the event-level on a 5-point Likert scale using a single-item question.
On days of sexual activity, men and women's difficulties with subjective sexual arousal were associated with lower sexual satisfaction in both partners (actor and partner effects). This association was mediated by the range of couples' sexual behaviors, such that lower subjective arousal was associated with a more restricted range of sexual activities, which in turn was associated with lower sexual satisfaction. Men's and women's difficulties with physiological sexual arousal, and women's genito-pelvic pain, were each associated with their own lower sexual satisfaction. No partner effects were observed for these sexual difficulties, nor were they mediated by the range of couples' sexual activities.
The study's results highlight how couples' sexual difficulties can interfere with same-day sexual satisfaction, and how for subjective sexual arousal, this interference is reflected by a more restricted range of sexual behaviors.
STRENGTH & LIMITATIONS: Strengths of the study include the daily diary methodology, which allowed a focus on event-level sexual activities with minimal retrospective bias. Further, the dyadic analyses allowed both intra-individual and inter-individual effects to be assessed. Limitations include the lack of a more general measure of sexual desire and of a more diverse sample, in terms of age, race, and sexual orientation.
These findings underscore the importance of treatments that include both partners, and that target the types as well as range of sexual activities in which couples engage. Jodouin J-F, Bergeron S, Janssen E. The Mediating Role of Sexual Behavior in Event-Level Associations Between Sexual Difficulties and Sexual Satisfaction in Newlywed Mixed-Sex Couples. J Sex Med 2018;15:1384-1392.
许多夫妻在日常生活中遇到的性困难,尽管其强度和持续时间不足以达到性障碍的临床诊断标准,但仍然很常见,并且是个人和关系困扰的根源。
本研究旨在评估夫妻日常亚临床性困难(具体为主观性唤起不足、生理性性唤起不足和生殖器疼痛)与夫妻所进行的性行为范围及其性满意度之间的事件级关联。
70 名新婚参与者(35 对夫妻,平均年龄为 25.6 岁,标准差为 3.2 岁;平均恋爱关系持续时间为 5.4 年,标准差为 3.4 年)分别在 5 周的时间内完成了关于性困难、性行为范围以及性满意度的日常日记。分析是基于演员-伴侣相互依存模型进行的。
主要结果是性满意度,使用 5 点李克特量表在事件水平上进行测量,使用一个单一问题。
在有性活动的日子里,男性和女性的主观性唤起困难与双方(演员和伴侣效应)的性满意度较低有关。这种关联通过夫妻性行为的范围来介导,即较低的主观唤起与性行为范围的限制有关,而这又与较低的性满意度有关。男性和女性的生理性性唤起困难以及女性的生殖器疼痛与他们自己较低的性满意度有关。这些性困难没有观察到伴侣效应,也没有通过夫妻性行为的范围来介导。
研究结果强调了夫妻的性困难如何干扰当天的性满意度,以及对于主观性唤起,这种干扰是通过更受限的性行为范围来反映的。
该研究的优势包括使用日常日记方法,可最小化回顾性偏差,重点关注事件级别的性活动。此外,二元分析允许评估个体内和个体间的效应。局限性包括缺乏更一般的性欲望测量以及年龄、种族和性取向方面的更具多样性的样本。
这些发现强调了包括伴侣在内的治疗方法的重要性,这些方法不仅要针对夫妻所参与的性行为类型,还要针对性行为范围。