Albano Stephen, Berman Blake, Fischberg Glenn, Siddiqi Javed, Liu Bolin, Khan Yasir, Zafar Atif, Quadri Syed A, Farooqui Mudassir
Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, CA, USA.
University of New Mexico, NM, USA.
Neurol Res Int. 2018 Sep 2;2018:5179356. doi: 10.1155/2018/5179356. eCollection 2018.
Nosocomial EVD-related ventriculitis is a major complication and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill neurological patients. Questions remain about best management of EVDs. The purpose of this study is to compare our incidence of ventriculitis to studies using different catheters and/or antibiotic coverage schemes and determine whether c-EVD with prolonged antibiotics given for the duration of drain placement is inferior to ac-EVD with pp-abx or ac-EVD with prolonged antibiotics for prevention of ventriculitis.
A retrospective chart review of all patients who had EVDs placed from January 2010 through December 2015 at home institution was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test to compare incidence of ventriculitis identified in other studies with that of home institution.
The study included 107 patients, 66 (61.7%) males and 41 (38.3%) females. Average age was 56 years ranging from 18 to 95 years. Average length of drain placement was 7.8 days ranging from 2 to 23 days. Average length of drain placement in infected drains was 13.3 days ranging from 11 to 15 days. There were 3 cases with positive CSF cultures ( and x 2). There were 2 cases with a CSF having a positive gram stain but failed to yield any bacterial growth on culture and did not meet predefined criteria.
The c-EVD with prolonged antibiotics given for the duration of drain placement is not inferior to ac-EVD with pp-abx or ac-EVD with prolonged antibiotics for prevention of ventriculitis. The c-EVD with prolonged antibiotics is superior to c-EVD with pp-abx and conventional EVD without antibiotics for prevention of ventriculitis. Selection should include considerations for antibiotic stewardship and cost effectiveness. Future studies should also utilize clinical and CSF profile criteria in addition to positive CSF cultures for identifying ventriculitis to prevent line colonization from classification as ventriculitis in analysis.
医院获得性埃博拉病毒病(EVD)相关脑室炎是重症神经科患者的主要并发症,也是发病和死亡的重要原因。关于EVD的最佳管理仍存在疑问。本研究的目的是将我们的脑室炎发病率与使用不同导管和/或抗生素覆盖方案的研究进行比较,并确定在引流管放置期间给予延长抗生素治疗的连续外置脑室引流(c-EVD)是否不如采用短程预防抗生素(pp-abx)的抗菌封管外置脑室引流(ac-EVD)或采用延长抗生素治疗的ac-EVD预防脑室炎。
对2010年1月至2015年12月在本机构接受EVD治疗的所有患者进行回顾性病历审查。采用Fisher精确检验进行统计分析,以比较其他研究中确定的脑室炎发病率与本机构的发病率。
该研究纳入107例患者,其中男性66例(61.7%),女性41例(38.3%)。平均年龄为56岁,范围为18至95岁。平均引流管放置时间为7.8天,范围为2至23天。感染引流管的平均放置时间为13.3天,范围为11至15天。有3例脑脊液培养阳性(以及x2)。有2例脑脊液革兰氏染色阳性,但培养未产生任何细菌生长,且不符合预定义标准。
在引流管放置期间给予延长抗生素治疗的c-EVD在预防脑室炎方面并不劣于采用pp-abx的ac-EVD或采用延长抗生素治疗的ac-EVD。在预防脑室炎方面,给予延长抗生素治疗的c-EVD优于采用pp-abx的c-EVD和未使用抗生素的传统EVD。选择应考虑抗生素管理和成本效益。未来的研究除了脑脊液培养阳性外,还应利用临床和脑脊液特征标准来识别脑室炎,以防止在分析中将导管定植误分类为脑室炎。