Miclau Theodore, Hoogervorst Paul, Shearer David W, El Naga Ashraf N, Working Zachary M, Martin Claude, Pesántez Rodrigo, Hüttl Tobias, Kojima Kodi E, Schütz Michael
Orthopaedic Trauma Institute, Institute for Global Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA.
AO Alliance Foundation, Davos, Switzerland.
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Oct;32 Suppl 7:S64-S70. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001301.
Although general trauma care systems and their effects on mortality reduction have been studied, little is known of the current state of musculoskeletal trauma delivery globally, particularly in low-income (LI) and low middle-income (LMI) countries. The goal of this study is to assess and describe the development and availability of musculoskeletal trauma care delivery worldwide.
MATERIALS & METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to evaluate different characteristics of general and musculoskeletal trauma care systems, including general aspects of systems, education, access to care and pre- and posthospital care. Surgical leaders involved with musculoskeletal trauma care were contacted to participate in the survey.
Of the 170 surveys sent, 95 were returned for use for the study. Nearly 30 percent of surgeons reported a formalized and coordinated trauma system in their countries. Estimates for the number of surgeons providing musculoskeletal trauma per one million inhabitants varied from 2.6 in LI countries to 58.8 in high-income countries. Worldwide, 15% of those caring for musculoskeletal trauma are fellowship trained. The survey results indicate a lack of implemented musculoskeletal trauma care guidelines across countries, with even high-income countries reporting less than 50% availability in most categories. Seventy-nine percent of the populations from LI countries were estimated to have no form of health care insurance. Formalized emergency medical services were reportedly available in only 33% and 50% of LI and LMI countries, respectively. Surgeons from LI and LMI countries responded that improvements in the availability of equipment (100%), number and locations of trauma-designated hospitals (90%), and physician training programs (88%) were necessary in their countries. The survey also revealed a general lack of resources for postoperative and rehabilitation care, irrespective of the country's income level.
This study addresses the current state of musculoskeletal trauma care delivery worldwide. These results indicate a greater need for trauma system development and support, from prehospital through posthospital care. Optimization of these systems can lead to better outcomes for patients after trauma. This study represents a critical first step toward better understanding the state of musculoskeletal trauma care in countries with different levels of resources, developing strategies to address deficiencies, and forming regional and international collaborations to develop musculoskeletal trauma care guidelines.
尽管已经对一般创伤护理系统及其对降低死亡率的影响进行了研究,但对于全球范围内肌肉骨骼创伤护理的现状,尤其是在低收入(LI)和低中收入(LMI)国家的情况,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是评估和描述全球肌肉骨骼创伤护理的发展情况和可及性。
设计了一份问卷,以评估一般创伤护理系统和肌肉骨骼创伤护理系统的不同特征,包括系统的一般方面、教育、护理可及性以及院前和院后护理。与参与肌肉骨骼创伤护理的外科带头人联系,邀请他们参与调查。
共发放了170份调查问卷,其中95份被收回用于本研究。近30%的外科医生报告称其所在国家有正式且协调的创伤护理系统。每百万居民中提供肌肉骨骼创伤护理的外科医生数量估计差异较大,从低收入国家的2.6名到高收入国家的58.8名不等。在全球范围内,接受过专科培训的肌肉骨骼创伤护理人员占比为15%。调查结果表明,各国普遍缺乏已实施的肌肉骨骼创伤护理指南,即使是高收入国家,在大多数类别中报告的指南可及率也不到50%。据估计,低收入国家79%的人口没有任何形式的医疗保险。据报告,正式的紧急医疗服务在低收入国家和低中收入国家的可及率分别仅为33%和50%。来自低收入和低中收入国家外科医生回应称,他们国家需要改善设备可及性(100%)、创伤指定医院的数量和地点(90%)以及医生培训项目(88%)。调查还显示,无论国家收入水平如何,术后和康复护理普遍缺乏资源。
本研究探讨了全球肌肉骨骼创伤护理的现状。这些结果表明,从院前到院后护理,对创伤护理系统的发展和支持有更大的需求。优化这些系统可以使创伤患者获得更好的治疗效果。本研究是迈向更好地了解不同资源水平国家肌肉骨骼创伤护理状况、制定解决不足之处的策略以及形成区域和国际合作以制定肌肉骨骼创伤护理指南的关键第一步。