阿加曲班、重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂与动脉内治疗在卒中中的安全性和可行性(ARTSS-IA研究)

Safety and Feasibility of Argatroban, Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator, and Intra-Arterial Therapy in Stroke (ARTSS-IA Study).

作者信息

Berekashvili Ketevan, Soomro Jazba, Shen Loren, Misra Vivek, Chen Peng R, Blackburn Spiros, Dannenbaum Mark, Grotta James C, Barreto Andrew D

机构信息

Neurology Department, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHSC), Houston, Texas.

Neurology Department, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Dec;27(12):3647-3651. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.08.036. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A randomized trial of concurrent recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (r-tPA) + thrombin-inhibition with Argatroban in stroke patients recently demonstrated safety and signal of efficacy compared to r-tPA alone, but patients having endovascular therapy (EVT) were excluded. The current study intended to study feasibility and safety of concurrent r-tPA and Argatroban in patients undergoing EVT.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, feasibility, and safety study of patients that received standard-dose r-tPA, had intracranial large vessel occlusions, and underwent EVT within 6 hours of stroke onset. During r-tPA, a 100 μg/kg Argatroban bolus, followed by 12-hour infusion, targeted an activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) 2.25 timesbaseline. Feasibility was defined as ability to combine treatments without EVT time-metric delays, compared to cotemporaneous r-tPA + EVT treatments. Safety was incidence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications.

RESULTS

All preplanned 10 patients were enrolled. Arterial occlusions were middle cerebral artery (n = 8), internal carotid artery (n = 1), and posterior cerebral artery (n = 1). All received Argatroban before EVT and completed infusions. There were no delays in time-metrics compared to nonstudy patients during the same period. Nine patients achieved excellent angiographic reperfusion (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Ischemia [TICI] ≥2b); with 7 complete (TICI = 3). There were no sICH, systemic hemorrhage, or EVT complications. At 90 days, 6 (60%) patients had a modified Rankin Scale of 0-2 and none died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients treated with r-tPA and EVT, concomitant Argatroban is feasible, does not delay EVT provision, produces high rates of recanalization, is probably safe, and warrants further study.

摘要

背景

一项针对中风患者同时使用重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(r-tPA)+阿加曲班进行凝血酶抑制的随机试验,近期显示与单独使用r-tPA相比具有安全性和疗效信号,但接受血管内治疗(EVT)的患者被排除在外。本研究旨在探讨同时使用r-tPA和阿加曲班在接受EVT患者中的可行性和安全性。

方法

我们对接受标准剂量r-tPA、颅内大血管闭塞且在中风发作6小时内接受EVT的患者进行了单臂、可行性和安全性研究。在使用r-tPA期间,静脉推注100μg/kg阿加曲班,随后进行12小时输注,目标是使活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)达到基线的2.25倍。可行性定义为与同期r-tPA+EVT治疗相比,能够在不延迟EVT时间指标的情况下联合治疗。安全性指标为症状性脑出血(sICH)、全身性出血或EVT并发症的发生率。

结果

所有10名预先计划的患者均入组。动脉闭塞部位为大脑中动脉(n=8)、颈内动脉(n=1)和大脑后动脉(n=1)。所有患者在EVT前均接受了阿加曲班治疗并完成输注。与同期非研究患者相比,时间指标无延迟。9名患者实现了良好的血管造影再灌注(脑缺血溶栓[TICI]≥2b);其中7例完全再灌注(TICI=3)。未发生sICH、全身性出血或EVT并发症。在90天时,6例(60%)患者改良Rankin量表评分为0-2分,无死亡病例。

结论

在接受r-tPA和EVT治疗的患者中,同时使用阿加曲班是可行的,不延迟EVT的实施,再通率高,可能安全,值得进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索