Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Blueprint Translational Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Dec;7(12):857-866. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0120. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) may be beneficial in treating both acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and ischemic heart failure (IHF). However, the safety profile and efficacy of MSC therapy is not well-known. We conducted a systematic review of clinical trials that evaluated the safety or efficacy of MSCs for AMI or IHF. Embase, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to September 27, 2017. Studies that examined the use of MSCs administered to adults with AMI or IHF were eligible. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess bias of included studies. The primary outcome was safety assessed by adverse events and the secondary outcome was efficacy which was assessed by mortality and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A total of 668 citations were reviewed and 23 studies met eligibility criteria. Of these, 11 studies evaluated AMI and 12 studies evaluated IHF. There was no association between MSCs and acute adverse events. There was a significant improvement in overall LVEF in patients who received MSCs (SMD 0.73, 95% CI 0.24-1.21). No significant difference in mortality was noted (Peto OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.38-1.22). Results from our systematic review suggest that MSC therapy for ischemic heart disease appears to be safe. There is a need for a well-designed adequately powered randomized control trial (with rigorous adverse event reporting and evaluations of cardiac function) to further establish a clear risk-benefit profile of MSCs. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;7:857-866.
临床前和临床证据表明,间充质干细胞(MSCs)可能有益于治疗急性心肌梗死(AMI)和缺血性心力衰竭(IHF)。然而,MSC 治疗的安全性和疗效尚不清楚。我们对评估 AMI 或 IHF 中 MSC 安全性或疗效的临床试验进行了系统评价。从开始到 2017 年 9 月 27 日,检索了 Embase、PubMed/Medline 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库。合格的研究检查了将 MSCs 用于 AMI 或 IHF 成人的使用情况。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估纳入研究的偏倚。主要结局是通过不良事件评估安全性,次要结局是通过死亡率和左心室射血分数(LVEF)评估疗效。共审查了 668 条引文,23 项研究符合入选标准。其中,11 项研究评估了 AMI,12 项研究评估了 IHF。MSC 与急性不良事件之间无关联。接受 MSCs 治疗的患者整体 LVEF 有显著改善(SMD 0.73,95%CI 0.24-1.21)。死亡率无显著差异(Peto OR 0.68,95%CI 0.38-1.22)。我们的系统评价结果表明,MSC 治疗缺血性心脏病似乎是安全的。需要设计良好、充分有力的随机对照试验(具有严格的不良事件报告和心脏功能评估),以进一步确定 MSCs 的明确风险效益概况。干细胞转化医学 2018;7:857-866。