Suppr超能文献

[缝合——内侧半月板损伤治疗的当前趋势]

[Suture - the Current Trend of Medial Meniscus Lesion Treatment].

作者信息

Pach M, Horáček F

机构信息

Ortopedické oddělení Nemocnice Břeclav.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):62-69.

Abstract

URPOSE OF THE STUDY The aim of this study was to summarise the current approaches to diagnostics and therapy of the medial meniscus tear, and to evaluate the short-term results of meniscus repair by outside-in and all-inside techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study included 24 patients who underwent medial meniscus repair for vertical longitudinal tear 10 mm or longer in length localised in the rear two-thirds of meniscus in the red-red or red-white zone at the author's workplace between June 2012 and December 2014. As regards the method, either outside-in or all-inside techniques were used, or the combination of both. The Steadman technique was used in cases of LCA ruptures. Before the surgery standard radiographs of the knee joint of each patient were taken. The Lysholm Knee Score was used to evaluate the function of the knee pre- and postoperatively. The Barrett's criteria were used to evaluate the healing of repaired meniscus. The clinical success was defined as an absence of any of such criteria. The satisfaction of the patients was evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS). The patients were followed up for 13.5 (6-36) months. RESULTS The functional results presented by Lysholm Knee Score demonstrate the improvement of all patients. When comparing the score measured before and after the surgery, this score increased from 67.1 ± 11.4 (24-81) preoperatively to 90.4 ± 13.0 (34-100) postoperatively. The outcome was excellent in 11 patients (45.8 per cent), good in 12 patients (50.0 per cent), and poor in one patient (4.2 per cent). According to the Barrett's criteria, 19 repaired menisci were healed (79.2 per cent) = success rate. In five patients at least one of the monitored criteria was positive. In these cases, the result was considered a failure. Patient satisfaction averaged at 8.0 ± 1.5 (3-10). Only one patient with the concurrent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear with poor functional result, positive Barrett's criteria and VAS 3 agrees with the proposed revision surgery. Regarding possible complications, no neurovascular injury, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or deep infection were reported. DISCUSSION The results presented in this research correspond to the outcomes of other authors, in particular as regards the shortterm follow-up. Other authors state that even the long-term results of Lysholm Knee Score related to meniscus repair are considerably better than the results after meniscectomy. When assessing the Barrett's criteria, the success rate of 79.2 per cent (19 patients) was reached; therefore, the failure rate was 20.8 per cent (5 patients). These results are comparable with the results of other authors whose success rate of meniscus repair ranges between 60 and 90 per cent. Based on the assessment of the VAS patient's satisfaction, the average rate of 8.0 points (3-10) was reached. A similar average rate of the patient's satisfaction amounting to 8.35 ± 1 (6-10) was reached in a similar designated study of Keyhani et al. carried out in 2015. Regarding possible complications, no neurovascular injury, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or deep infection were reported. Similar observation of the low complication rate can be seen in the research studies of other authors. CONCLUSIONS Our short-term follow-up revealed that the postoperative results of Lysholm Knee Score considerably improved, the satisfaction rate of the patients was high and the failure rate is entirely in line with the values stated in literature. The results of our study confirm that in the indicated cases the meniscus repair is an effective method of treatment of vertical longitudinal tears located in both RR and RW zones. The preserved meniscus is considerably supportive to ensure stability of the knee joint, in particular in the event of concurrent rupture of anterior cruciate ligament, and to prevent early osteoarthritic changes. Nevertheless, it is necessary to carry out further randomized clinical studies with a larger number of patients and a longerterm follow-up to confirm our results. Key words:meniscus tear, meniscus repair, outside-in and all-inside technique, evaluation of results.

摘要

研究目的 本研究旨在总结目前内侧半月板撕裂的诊断和治疗方法,并评估由外向内和全内技术进行半月板修复的短期结果。材料与方法 本研究纳入了24例患者,这些患者于2012年6月至2014年12月在作者所在单位因位于半月板后三分之二的垂直纵向撕裂(长度为10 mm或更长),处于红-红区或红-白区,而接受内侧半月板修复。在方法上,采用了由外向内技术、全内技术或两者结合的方法。对于前交叉韧带(LCA)断裂的病例采用Steadman技术。在手术前,对每位患者的膝关节进行标准X线片检查。采用Lysholm膝关节评分来评估膝关节术前和术后的功能。采用Barrett标准来评估修复半月板的愈合情况。临床成功定义为不存在任何此类标准。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的满意度。对患者进行了13.5(6 - 36)个月的随访。结果 Lysholm膝关节评分所呈现的功能结果表明所有患者均有改善。比较手术前后测量的评分,该评分从术前的67.1±11.4(24 - 81)增加到术后的90.4±13.0(34 - 100)。11例患者(45.8%)结果为优,12例患者(50.0%)为良,1例患者(4.2%)为差。根据Barrett标准,19个修复的半月板愈合(79.2%) = 成功率。5例患者至少有一项监测标准为阳性。在这些病例中,结果被视为失败。患者满意度平均为8.0±1.5(3 - 10)。只有1例同时患有前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂、功能结果差、Barrett标准阳性且VAS评分为3分的患者同意进行建议的翻修手术。关于可能的并发症,未报告神经血管损伤、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)或深部感染。讨论 本研究呈现的结果与其他作者的结果一致,特别是在短期随访方面。其他作者指出,即使与半月板修复相关的Lysholm膝关节评分的长期结果也明显优于半月板切除术后的结果。在评估Barrett标准时,成功率达到了79.2%(共19例患者);因此,失败率为20.8%(5例患者)。这些结果与其他作者的结果相当,他们的半月板修复成功率在60%至90%之间。基于对VAS患者满意度的评估,达到了平均8.0分(3 - 10)。在Keyhani等人于2015年进行的类似指定研究中,患者满意度的平均率达到了类似的8.35±1(6 - 10)。关于可能的并发症,未报告神经血管损伤、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)或深部感染。在其他作者的研究中也可以看到类似的低并发症率观察结果。结论 我们的短期随访表明,Lysholm膝关节评分的术后结果有显著改善,患者满意度高,失败率完全符合文献中所述的值。我们的研究结果证实,在所示病例中,半月板修复是治疗位于RR区和RW区的垂直纵向撕裂的有效方法。保留的半月板对确保膝关节的稳定性有很大帮助,特别是在前交叉韧带同时断裂的情况下,并可预防早期骨关节炎改变。然而,有必要进行进一步的随机临床研究,纳入更多患者并进行更长时间的随访,以证实我们的结果。关键词:半月板撕裂;半月板修复;由外向内和全内技术;结果评估

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验