University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California (S.J.S.).
University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (M.H.E.).
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 16;169(8):517-527. doi: 10.7326/M17-2762. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Stroke rates in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) who are not receiving anticoagulant therapy vary widely across published studies; the resulting effect on the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation in AF is unknown.
To determine the effect of variation in published AF stroke rates on the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation.
Markov model decision analysis. Warfarin was the base case, and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were modeled in a secondary analysis.
Community-dwelling adults.
33 434 adults with incident AF.
Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs).
Of the 33 434 patients, 27 179 had a CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, and vascular disease) score of 2 or more. The population benefit of warfarin anticoagulation for these patients was least using stroke rates from the ATRIA (AnTicoagulation and Risk Factors In Atrial Fibrillation) study and greatest using those from the Danish National Patient Registry (6290 QALYs [95% CI, ±2.3%] vs. 24 110 QALYs [CI, ±1.9%]; P < 0.001). The optimal CHA2DS2-VASc score threshold for anticoagulation was 3 or more using stroke rates from ATRIA, 2 or more using those from the Swedish AF cohort study, 1 or more using those from the SPORTIF (Stroke Prevention using ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation) study, and 0 or more using those from the Danish National Patient Registry. Accounting for lower rates of NOAC-associated intracranial hemorrhage decreased optimal CHA2DS2-VASc score thresholds, but these thresholds still varied widely.
Measured benefit may not generalize to other populations.
Variation in published AF stroke rates for patients not receiving anticoagulant therapy results in multifold variation in the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation. Guidelines should better reflect the uncertainty in current thresholds of stroke risk score for recommending anticoagulation.
None.
未接受抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(AF)患者的卒中发生率在已发表的研究中差异很大;抗凝治疗在 AF 中的净临床获益的影响尚不清楚。
确定发表的 AF 卒中发生率变化对抗凝净临床获益的影响。
Markov 模型决策分析。华法林为基础案例,非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOACs)在二次分析中建模。
社区居住的成年人。
33434 例新发 AF 患者。
质量调整生命年(QALY)。
在 33434 例患者中,27179 例患者的 CHA2DS2-VASc(充血性心力衰竭、高血压、年龄、糖尿病、卒中、血管疾病)评分≥2 分。对于这些患者,华法林抗凝治疗的人群获益最低来自 ATRIA(抗凝和心房颤动中的危险因素)研究,最高来自丹麦国家患者登记处(6290 QALYs [95%CI,±2.3%] vs. 24110 QALYs [CI,±1.9%];P<0.001)。使用 ATRIA 的卒中发生率,最佳 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分抗凝阈值为 3 或更高;使用瑞典 AF 队列研究的卒中发生率,最佳 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分抗凝阈值为 2 或更高;使用 SPORTIF(口服凝血酶抑制剂在心房颤动中的卒中预防)研究的卒中发生率,最佳 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分抗凝阈值为 1 或更高;使用丹麦国家患者登记处的卒中发生率,最佳 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分抗凝阈值为 0 或更高。考虑到 NOAC 相关颅内出血率降低,最佳 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分阈值降低,但这些阈值仍然差异很大。
测量的益处可能不适用于其他人群。
未接受抗凝治疗的患者发表的 AF 卒中发生率的差异导致抗凝净临床获益存在多倍差异。指南应更好地反映目前推荐抗凝治疗的卒中风险评分阈值的不确定性。
无。